Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503075›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

An Automated Model Annotation System (AMAS) for SBML Models.

Woosub Shin, John H Gennari, Joseph L Hellerstein, Herbert M Sauro

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Woosub ShinAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland,1010,New Zealand.
John H GennariDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, WA, USA.
Joseph L HellersteineScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle,98195, WA, USA.
Herbert M SauroDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, WA, USA.

Funding

TR&D3: Standards and Tools for Simulator Composition and Credibility portalP41EB023912 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Ion I. Moraru, HERBERT M. SAURO · 2018 to 2026
$11.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Annotations of biochemical models provide details of chemical species, documentation of chemical reactions, and other essential information. Unfortunately, the vast majority of biochemical models have few, if any, annotations, or the annotations provide insufficient detail to understand the limitations of the model. The quality and quantity of annotations can be improved by developing tools that recommend annotations. For example, recommender tools have been developed for annotations of genes. Although annotating genes is conceptually similar to annotating biochemical models, there are important technical differences that make it difficult to directly apply this prior work. Results: We present AMAS, a system that predicts annotations for elements of models represented in the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) community standard. We provide a general framework for predicting model annotations for a query element based on a database of annotated reference elements and a match score function that calculates the similarity between the query element and reference elements. The framework is instantiated to specific element types (e.g., species, reactions) by specifying the reference database (e.g., ChEBI for species) and the match score function (e.g., string similarity). We analyze the computational efficiency and prediction quality of AMAS for species and reactions in BiGG and BioModels and find that it has sub-second response times and accuracy between 80% and 95% depending on specifics of what is predicted. We have incorporated AMAS into an open-source, pip-installable Python package that can run as a command-line tool that predicts and adds annotations to species and reactions to an SBML model. Availability: Our project is hosted at https://github.com/sys-bio/AMAS, where we provide examples, documentation, and source code files. Our source code is licensed under the MIT open-source license.

Indexed as

annotationmodel curationSBMLsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID37503075
PMCPMC10370092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.