Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503038›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

A dual Purkinje cell rate and synchrony code sculpts reach kinematics.

Abdulraheem Nashef, Michael S Spindle, Dylan J Calame, Abigail L Person

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdulraheem NashefDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, 80045, CO, USA.
Michael S SpindleDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, 80045, CO, USA.
Dylan J CalameDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, 80045, CO, USA.
Abigail L PersonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, 80045, CO, USA.

Funding

Circuit mechanisms of cerebellar control of reaching movementsR01NS114430 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Jason M Christie, Abigail L Person · 2019 to 2026
$3.4M
Mechanisms of Purkinje Cell Encoding of Limb Kinematics in Skilled ReachF31NS113395 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CALAME, DYLAN · 2019 to 2021
$90k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS113395NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) encode movement kinematics in their population firing rates. Firing rate suppression is hypothesized to disinhibit neurons in the cerebellar nuclei, promoting adaptive movement adjustments. Debates persist, however, about whether a second disinhibitory mechanism, PC simple spike synchrony, is a relevant population code. We addressed this question by relating PC rate and synchrony patterns recorded with high density probes, to mouse reach kinematics. We discovered behavioral correlates of PC synchrony that align with a known causal relationship between activity in cerebellar output. Reach deceleration was positively correlated with both Purkinje firing rate decreases and synchrony, consistent with both mechanisms disinhibiting target neurons, which are known to adjust reach velocity. Direct tests of the contribution of each coding scheme to nuclear firing using dynamic clamp, combining physiological rate and synchrony patterns ex vivo, confirmed that physiological levels of PC simple spike synchrony are highly facilitatory for nuclear firing. These findings suggest that PC firing rate and synchrony collaborate to exert fine control of movement.

Identifiers

PMID37503038
PMCPMC10370034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.