Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502828›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2023

Sequestration of steroidal estrogen in aqueous samples using an adsorption mechanism: a systemic scientometric review.

Ajibola A Bayode, Chijioke Olisah, Stephen Sunday Emmanuel, Morenike Oluwabunmi Adesina, Daniel Terlanga Koko

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ajibola A BayodeDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Redeemer's University P.M.B. 230 232101 Ede Nigeria bayodea@run.edu.ng.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2461-6208
Chijioke OlisahInstitute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University P. O Box 77000 Gqeberha 6031 South Africa.
Stephen Sunday EmmanuelDepartment of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University of Ilorin P.M.B. 1515 Ilorin Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0896-2776
Morenike Oluwabunmi AdesinaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Lead City University Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3683-2506
Daniel Terlanga KokoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Redeemer's University P.M.B. 230 232101 Ede Nigeria bayodea@run.edu.ng.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6921-6406
Redeemer's University · NGLead City University · NGNelson Mandela University · ZAUniversity of Ilorin · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Steroidal estrogens (SEs) remain one of the notable endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment in this era owing to their interference with the normal metabolic functions of the human body systems. They are currently identified as emerging contaminants of water sources. The sources of SEs are either natural or synthetic active ingredients in oral contraceptive and hormonal replacement therapy drugs and enter the environment primarily from excretes in the form of active free conjugate radicals, resulting in numerous effects on organisms in aquatic habitats and humans. The removal of SEs from water sources is of great importance because of their potential adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems and human health. Adsorption techniques have gained considerable attention as effective methods for the removal of these contaminants. A systemic review and bibliometric analysis of the application of adsorption for sequestration were carried out. Metadata for publications on SE removal utilizing adsorbents were obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) from January 1, 1990, to November 5, 2022 (107 documents) and Scopus databases from January 1, 1949, to November 5, 2022 (77 documents). In total, 137 documents (134 research and 4 review articles) were used to systematically map bibliometric indicators, such as the number of articles, most prolific countries, most productive scholars, and most cited articles, confirming this to be a growing research area. The use of different adsorbents, include activated carbon graphene-based materials, single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes, biochar, zeolite, and nanocomposites. The adsorption mechanism and factors affecting the removal efficiency, such as pH, temperature, initial concentration, contact time and adsorbent properties, were investigated in this review. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of different adsorbents, including their adsorption capacities, regenerative potential, and cost-effectiveness. Recent advances and innovations in adsorption technology, such as functionalized materials and hybrid systems, have also been highlighted. Overall, the bibliographic analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the adsorption technique for the removal of SEs from other sources, serving as a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers involved in the development of efficient and sustainable strategies to mitigate the effects of these emerging contaminants.

Identifiers

PMID37502828
PMCPMC10369132
OpenAlexW4385273343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.