ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2021
Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Pregnancy: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical Thrombectomy as Stroke Management in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are effective treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the treatment for AIS in pregnancy is not established because no clinical trials have included pregnant patients. We present a case of middle cerebral artery (MCA) M2 segment occlusion in pregnancy treated with IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy. Case Presentation: A 36-year-old woman being 6 weeks pregnant presented with right-sided hemiparesis and aphasia. MRI showed a high-intensity area on diffusion-weighted imaging of the left parietal lobe, and MRA showed left MCA M2 segment occlusion. She underwent IV rt-PA and MT and achieved thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b revascularization without complications. The protein S concentration was lower than that in the physiological changes during pregnancy. She was diagnosed with embolic stroke related to coagulopathy in pregnancy, and she underwent anticoagulation. At the 3-month follow-up, the modified Rankin Scale was 0. She miscarried at 4 months, and the fetal death was presumed to be obstetric cause. Conclusion: IV rt-PA and MT may be effective and safe treatments for pregnant patients. Estimated fetal radiation exposure during MT is low and is presumed not to affect fetal development. We should mitigate the radiation dose and reduce the dose of iodinated contrast agents, particularly in pregnant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.