ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2021
A Method to Evaluate Vessel Deviation during Withdrawal of a Stent Retriever Using a Silicon Vascular Model.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low radial and axial force stent retriever reduces symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy for acute middle cerebral artery and medium vessel occlusion: a prospective pilot study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The initial experience with the Embotrap III stent-retriever in a real world setting.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Article
- Disconnection of a stent retriever's pushwire caught by an accordion-like deformed aspiration catheter during mechanical thrombectomy: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2023Article
- Experimental Validation of Pullout Resistance for Stent Retrievers and Aspiration Catheters.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Catastrophic complications may develop because of vessel deviation during device delivery into intracranial vessels for neurointerventions. We report a novel method using a silicon model capable of evaluating vessel deviation as a numerical value. Methods: In all, 10 tiny markers, each with a pitch of approximately 5 mm, were attached to the vessel model along the long axis. We used a high-resolution camera to record movies of the deviation of the vessel model while employing different stent retrievers. The movies were reviewed to determine the maximum deviation of each marker on the vessel model. Results: As expected, stent retrievers of the same type exhibited more vessel shifts when they had a larger diameter and longer length. On the other hand, stents with a segmental structure demonstrated less vessel deviation than those with a tubular structure, regardless of the large lumen and long length. Conclusion: If the degree of vessel stress can be represented by a numerical value, areas where the careful use of different devices for neurointerventions is required may be able to be identified. Moreover, this method may be useful for training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.