Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502700›Full record

ArticleSurgery in practice and science2023

Current use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator in academic surgery: a mixed-methods study.

Samuel M Miller, Sara Abou Azar, James S Farrelly, Garrett A Salzman, Meaghan E Broderick, Katherine M Sanders, Vincent P Anto, Nathan Patel, Alfredo C Cordova, Kevin M Schuster and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rethinking the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Surgery: Centralized Risk Assessment for System-Level Impact.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Response to: Comment on "Integrating Human Intuition into Prediction Algorithms for Improved Surgical Risk Stratification".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Samuel M MillerDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
Sara Abou AzarDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
James S FarrellyDepartment of Surgery, Quinnipiac University School of Medicine, United States.
Garrett A SalzmanDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, United States.
Meaghan E BroderickDepartment of Surgery, Stamford Health System, United States.
Katherine M SandersDepartment of Surgery, UCSF School of Medicine, United States.
Vincent P AntoDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States.
Nathan PatelDepartment of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, United States.
Alfredo C CordovaDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States.
Kevin M SchusterDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
Tyler J JonesDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
Lisa M KodadekDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
Cary P GrossDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
John M MortonDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
Ronnie A RosenthalDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
Robert D BecherDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, United States.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001864 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$9.9M
Postdoctoral Research Training in Biotherapy of CancerT32CA113263 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Udai S Kammula · 2006 to 2026
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001864NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to quantitatively assess use of the NSQIP surgical risk calculator (NSRC) in contemporary surgical practice and to identify barriers to use and potential interventions that might increase use. Materials and methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of surgeons at seven institutions. The primary outcomes were self-reported application of the calculator in general clinical practice and specific clinical scenarios as well as reported barriers to use. Results: In our sample of 99 surgeons (49.7% response rate), 73.7% reported use of the NSRC in the past month. Approximately half (51.9%) of respondents reported infrequent NSRC use (<20% of preoperative discussions), while 14.3% used it in ≥40% of preoperative assessments. Reported use was higher in nonelective cases (30.2% vs 11.1%) and in patients who were ≥65 years old (37.1% vs 13.0%), functionally dependent (41.2% vs 6.6%), or with surrogate consent (39.9% vs 20.4%). NSRC use was not associated with training status or years in practice. Respondents identified a lack of influence on the decision to pursue surgery as well as concerns regarding the calculator's accuracy as barriers to use. Surgeons suggested improving integration to workflow and better education as strategies to increase NSRC use. Conclusions: Many surgeons reported use of the NSRC, but few used it frequently. Surgeons reported more frequent use in nonelective cases and frail patients, suggesting the calculator is of greater utility for high-risk patients. Surgeons raised concerns about perceived accuracy and suggested additional education as well as integration of the calculator into the electronic health record.

Indexed as

High-risk patientsNSQIP surgical risk calculatorRisk assessmentSurgical decision-making

Identifiers

PMID37502700
PMCPMC10373440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.