ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2022
Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using an Aspiration Catheter Compared with a Stent Retriever Alone for Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Occlusion.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct aspiration vs. stent retriever for middle cerebral artery M2 occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for middle cerebral artery M2 occlusion (M2O) is challenging because the procedure is performed in a narrow and tortuous artery. In this study, we compared MT using an aspiration catheter (AC) versus a stent retriever (SR) used alone, and retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of MT using an AC for M2O. Methods: Seventy-four consecutive patients who underwent MT for M2O at our institution between April 2016 and April 2020 were evaluated. The subjects were classified into those treated by AC (AC group) or SR alone (SR group). The AC group included patients treated by both contact aspiration and a combination technique of AC and SR. Background factors and outcomes, including modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2c-3 recanalization, were compared between the groups. Results: AC and SR groups consisted of 47 and 27 patients respectively. Among them, the rate of mTICI 2b-3 was 93.6% vs 92.6%, and that of mTICI 2c-3 was 72.3% vs 48.2% (P = 0.004). The perioperative symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) rate was 0% vs 7.4%, and modified Rankin scale scores of 0-2 were 78.6% vs 50% (P = 0.03). In the AC group, the mTICI 2c-3 rate was higher in patients in whom the AC was adequately advanced to the thrombus compared to those with inadequate AC advancement (83.3% vs 36.3%, P = 0.002). Conclusion: The rate of mTICI 2c-3 was higher in the AC than SR group, with no cases of symptomatic SAH. MT using AC for M2O might achieve safe and effective thrombectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.