ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2022
Relationship between Dilution Magnification of Non-Ionic Iodinated Contrast Medium and Amplification Effect of Radiation Dose.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical in-syringe mixing method for uniform particle delivery during embolization procedures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Neuroendovascular treatments are less invasive than surgical clipping. However, the number of fluoroscopy runs may be greater when a contrast medium is used than when routine angiography is performed. Several recent studies have suggested that an iodinated contrast medium causes an increase in the radiation dose. Therefore, it is clinically important to identify physical factors causing amplification of the radiation dose. The purpose of this study was to investigate how dilution of a contrast medium with water influences the amplification effect of the radiation dose using simulation analysis. Methods: Three different types of commercially available contrast media, namely, iopamidol, iohexol, and iodixanol, were diluted 1.7-3.3 times with water and placed in the left brain parenchyma of a numerical brain phantom. Using the Monte Carlo simulation method, the phantom was exposed to X-ray beams under constant exposure conditions, and the energy absorbed in the entire region of the left brain parenchyma was estimated. At the same time, the content and volume of a contrast medium in the cerebral vessels were predicted on the basis of pharmacokinetic and fractal analyses. Results: The increase in absorbed energy was attributed to secondary electrons emitted from the contrast medium and varied depending on its content and volume. Interestingly, the amount of energy absorbed increased with increasing dilution of the contrast medium. Furthermore, the amplification effect of the radiation dose varied according to the type of contrast medium used. Conclusion: These results suggest that the amplification effect of the radiation dose is closely related to an increase in the cross-sectional area in which the X-rays interact with the contrast medium, which is caused by increased distribution of contrast medium in the cerebral vessels. When the contrast medium is diluted with water, its spread in the cerebral vessels plays a more important role than its content in the amplification effect of the radiation dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.