ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2022
Atypical Incomplete Detachment Following PulseRider Deployment.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Owing to the limited time since the introduction of the PulseRider (PR), inconsequential or rare complications that clinicians should be aware of remain unreported yet. Here, we report a rare complication of incomplete detachment. Case Presentation: A 50-year-old male underwent PR-assisted coil embolization for a basilar tip aneurysm. Coiling was completed, and the detachment procedure was performed using a detachment machine; the success signal was observed. The delivery microcatheter was subsequently advanced back up to the proximal markers, and no reapproximation of the proximal markers, which indicates successful detachment, was observed. However, only one of the proximal markers returned to the microcatheter, and incomplete detachment of only one leg was detected. Ultimately, electrical detachment was not possible, and physical separation by tension was achieved. Conclusion: Our case report presents a rare case of a detachment problem in the PR. The PR could not be detached, although the signal revealed successful detachment. Therefore, careful withdrawal of the delivery wire by checking not only the proximal markers but also the behavior of the entire PR and coil complex is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.