ArticleJournal of psychiatry and brain science2023
Preventive and Therapeutic Autoantibodies Protect against Neuronal Excitotoxicity.
Article in Journal of psychiatry and brain science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies are associated with lower risk for depression and PTSD symptoms after traumatic brain injury.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Pro-Cognitive Effects of IgM Isotype Anti-NMDAR1 Autoantibodies in Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Natural Anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies associate with slowed decline of cognitive functions in Alzheimer's diseases.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
High titers of anti-NMDAR1 IgG autoantibodies were found in the brains of patients with anti-NMDAR1 encephalitis that exhibits psychosis, impaired memory, and many other psychiatric symptoms in addition to neurological symptoms. Low titers of blood circulating anti-NMDAR1 IgG autoantibodies are sufficient to robustly impair spatial working memory in mice with intact blood-brain barriers (BBB). On the other hand, anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies were reported to protect against neuronal excitotoxicity caused by excessive glutamate in neurological diseases. Activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs is responsible for neuronal excitotoxicity, whereas activation of synaptic NMDARs within the synaptic cleft is pro-survival and essential for NMDAR-mediated neurotransmission. Unlike small IgG, IgM antibodies are large and pentameric (diameter of ~30 nm). It is plausible that IgM anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies may be restricted to bind extrasynaptic NMDARs and thereby specifically inhibit neuronal excitotoxicity, but physically too large to enter the synaptic cleft (width: 20-30 nm) to suppress synaptic NMDAR-mediated neurotransmission in modulation of cognitive function and neuronal pro-survival signaling. Hence, blood circulating anti-NMDAR1 IgM autoantibodies are both neuroprotective and pro-cognitive, whereas blood circulating anti-NMDAR1 IgG and IgA autoantibodies are detrimental to cognitive function. Investigation of anti-NMDAR1 IgM autoantibodies may open up a new avenue for the development of long-lasting preventive and therapeutic IgM anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies that protect from neuronal excitotoxicity in many neurological diseases and psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.