Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502460›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2020

Ideas Developed from the Routine Use of Problem-solving Skills in Neuroendovascular Therapy.

Tomotaka Ohshima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tomotaka OhshimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: All physicians should endeavor to perform safe and rapid neuroendovascular operations. We describe the process of identifying novel methods and highlight some representative clinical examples from our practice. Methods: We made a habit of asking questions regarding problems encountered during operations. Potential solutions are often identified and noted in our smartphones or as memos. These solutions are then evaluated by experiments in vascular models before assessing their efficacy in clinical settings. Results: Some ideas based on our process of raising problems and finding solutions were published, and found to be relevant to the wider scientific community. Moreover, all ideas were applicable in most settings due to the use of conventional, familiar, and cheap methods and equipment. The paper rail method, modified pigtail shape microguidewire, microcatheter Conclusions: We reported methods of neuroendovascular therapy identified through the routine practice of problem-solving by our team.

Indexed as

endovascular therapyguidewiremicrocathetertechniques

Identifiers

PMID37502460
PMCPMC10370801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.