ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2022
The Case of a Patient with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Who Required Additional Stenting for Stent-Adjacent Stenosis.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Migratory Venous Sinus Stenosis After Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: a Single-Center Case Series.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We report the case of a patient with recurred idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with transverse sinus (TS) stenosis after initial stenting, which was treated with additional stent placed in tandem to the secondarily occurred stent-adjacent stenosis (SAS). Case Presentation: A 41-year-old woman complained of reduced visual acuity and blurred vision, and presented with papilledema. Lumbar puncture revealed an opening pressure of 36 cmH Conclusion: Patients with post-VSS recurrent IIH may develop restenosis in the remaining parts of TS at variable progression speeds. In this case, angiography revealed gradually advancing stenosis that seemed to form SAS at the time of recurrence. If the initial VSS is effective for IIH, SAS can also be treated effectively and less invasively with a second stent placement covering the entire TS length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.