Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502338›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2023

Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Performance Characteristics in Those With and Without Hemorrhoids.

Derek W Ebner, David Rushlow, Joshua Mou, Kyle Porter, Lila J Finney Rutten, Paul Limburg, Feyza Sancar, Thomas F Imperiale

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01397747 (Multi-Target Colorectal Cancer Screening Test for the Detection of Colorectal Advanced Adenomatous Polyps and Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01397747 completednot on this map

Multi-Target Colorectal Cancer Screening Test for the Detection of Colorectal Advanced Adenomatous Polyps and Cancer: DeeP-C Study

TypeobservationalSponsorExact Sciences CorporationRan2011 to 2013Enrolled12,776ConditionsColorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Derek W EbnerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
David RushlowDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Joshua MouExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI.
Kyle PorterExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI.
Lila J Finney RuttenExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI.
Paul LimburgExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI.
Feyza SancarExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI.
Thomas F ImperialeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Exact Sciences (United States) · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of hemorrhoids on noninvasive stool test performance for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of test characteristics for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, on the basis of hemorrhoid status, recorded at the time of colonoscopy, among patients enrolled in the pivotal prospective study for mt-sDNA that was conducted from June 2011, to May 2013. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values) for FIT and mt-sDNA (performed < 90 days before colonoscopy) were stratified by the presence of hemorrhoids and compared. Results: Hemorrhoids were found in 51.7% (5163 of 9989) of the study cohort. Across all test characteristics, there were no statistically significant differences for FIT or mt-sDNA when stratified by hemorrhoid status. Analysis revealed mt-sDNA sensitivity of 44% and 41% for advanced precancerous lesions in nonhemorrhoidal and hemorrhoid patients, respectively ( Conclusion: The presence of asymptomatic hemorrhoids did not adversely affect test performance in this large clinical study. These findings suggest that in the absence of overt gastrointestinal bleeding, FIT and mt-sDNA are options for CRC screening, irrespective of hemorrhoid status. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01397747.

Identifiers

PMID37502338
PMCPMC10371761
OpenAlexW4385330271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.