Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502312›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2023

Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study.

Rachel Anne Reed, Anna M Krikorian, Rose M Reynolds, Brittany T Holmes, Megan M Branning, Margaret B Lemons, Michele Barletta, Jane E Quandt, Charlotte C Burns, Stephanie C Dantino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of Intraperitoneal Lidocaine in Horses Undergoing Laparotomy for Colic.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel Anne ReedDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Anna M KrikorianDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Rose M ReynoldsDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Brittany T HolmesDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Megan M BranningDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Margaret B LemonsDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Michele BarlettaDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Jane E QuandtDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Charlotte C BurnsDepartment of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Stephanie C DantinoDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Daniel M SakaiDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Equine pain scoring may be affected by the residual effect of anesthetic drugs. Objectives: To compare pain scores in the hours immediately following anesthetic recovery to baseline pre-anesthetic scores in equine patients undergoing surgical and non-surgical procedures. Study design: Clinical observational study. Methods: Fifty adult horses undergoing anesthesia for surgical or non-surgical procedures were enrolled. Horses underwent pain scoring using the Composite Pain Score (CPS) and Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP) prior to anesthesia (T0) and following anesthetic recovery to standing, every hour for 5 h (T1-T5). Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed effects model. A post-hoc Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons was performed for variables where an effect was detected. Results: Mean (95% confidence interval) CPS scores for T0-T5 were 1.6 (1.2-2.0), 6.8 (6.0-7.6), 5.1 (4.3-5.9), 4.3 (3.4-5.2), 3.7 (2.8-4.6), and 2.8 (2.0-3.6) and EQUUS-FAP scores were 0.6 (0.3-0.9), 3.0 (2.5-3.5), 1.9 (1.6-2.2), 1.1 (0.8-1.4), 0.6 (0.4-0.8), and 0.7 (0.4-1.0), respectively. For the CPS, scores greater than 5, and for the EQUUS-FAP scores greater than 3, are consistent with minor pain. There was no effect of type of procedure (surgical vs non-surgical) on CPS or EQUUS-FAP scores. There was an effect of time with CPS scores significantly greater than baseline at T1-T5 and EQUUS-FAP scores significantly greater than baseline at T1 and T2. Main limitations: Discomfort caused by hoisting was not quantified and it was difficult to ascertain if this affected the results. Conclusions: Post-anesthetic pain scores may be influenced by the residual effect of anesthetic agents for as long as 5 h and 2 h for the CPS and EQUUS-FAP, respectively.

Indexed as

analgesiaanesthesiahorsepainpain score

Identifiers

PMID37502312
PMCPMC10369185
OpenAlexW4384025395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.