Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502294›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2023

A Coordinated and Multidisciplinary Strategy can Reduce the Time for Antibiotics in Septic Patients at a University Hospital.

Rafael Barberena Moraes, Jaqueline Sangiogo Haas, Josi Vidart, Rafael Nicolaidis, Caroline Deutschendorf, Miriane Melo Silveira Moretti, Gilberto Friedman, Daiandy Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Early Antibiotics in Septic Shock: A Desirable Goal but "Curb Your Enthusiasm".Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rafael Barberena MoraesHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-7260
Jaqueline Sangiogo HaasHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9721-9903
Josi VidartHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6247
Rafael NicolaidisHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-471X
Caroline DeutschendorfHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6114-824X
Miriane Melo Silveira MorettiHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-5997
Gilberto FriedmanPrograma de Pos-graduacao em Ciencias Pneumologicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9369-2488
Daiandy SilvaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8421-4716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We carried out this work with the aim of assessing the effectiveness of a set of interventions over time for the administration of antibiotics. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Patients admitted to the emergency room and ICU of the hospital where the study was conducted are evaluated daily for some sociodemographic and clinical variables. Among them are some quality indicators, such as the time between the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock until the start of the infusion of antibiotics. This indicator reflects several aspects related to a set of assistance measures (adequacy of antibiotic dispensation, rapid response team (RRT), sepsis care quality improvement program, antimicrobial management program, improvements in emergency department assistance). Patients or participants: Patients with sepsis or septic shock were admitted to the ICU of a university and public hospital in southern Brazil. Main variables of interest: The time between the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock and the beginning of the infusion of antibiotics. Results: Between 2013 and 2018, 1676 patients were evaluated. The mean time for antibiotic infusion decreased from 6.1 ± 8.6 hours to 1.7 ± 2.9 hours ( Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrated that a set of actions adopted in a large tertiary hospital was associated with decreased time to start antibiotic therapy in septic patients. How to cite this article: Moraes RB, Haas JS, Vidart J, Nicolaidis R, Deutschendorf C, Moretti MMS,

Indexed as

AntibioticQuality improvementSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID37502294
PMCPMC10369314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.