Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502274›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

Measuring the relative contribution to predictive power of modern nucleotide substitution modeling approaches.

Thomas Bujaki, Katharine Van Looyen, Nicolas Rodrigue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas BujakiDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.
Katharine Van LooyenDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.
Nicolas RodrigueDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional approaches to probabilistic phylogenetic inference have relied on information-theoretic criteria to select among a relatively small set of substitution models. These model selection criteria have recently been called into question when applied to richer models, including models that invoke mixtures of nucleotide frequency profiles. At the nucleotide level, we are therefore left without a clear picture of mixture models' contribution to overall predictive power relative to other modeling approaches. Here, we utilize a Bayesian cross-validation method to directly measure the predictive performance of a wide range of nucleotide substitution models. We compare the relative contributions of free nucleotide exchangeability parameters, gamma-distributed rates across sites, and mixtures of nucleotide frequencies with both finite and infinite mixture frameworks. We find that the most important contributor to a model's predictive power is the use of a sufficiently rich mixture of nucleotide frequencies. These results suggest that mixture models should be given greater consideration in nucleotide-level phylogenetic inference.

Identifiers

PMID37502274
PMCPMC10371494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.