Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502245›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2023

Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans' health administration: a multicenter qualitative study.

DeShauna Jones, Alexandre R Marra, Daniel Livorsi, Eli Perencevich, Michihiko Goto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical decision support menu for reducing unnecessary urine cultures.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

DeShauna JonesCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-361X
Alexandre R MarraCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-7688
Daniel LivorsiCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-214X
Eli PerencevichCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3721-3355
Michihiko GotoCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6612-5613
University of Iowa · US

Funding

The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
AHRQ HHS K08 HS027472NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a multicenter, try automated dashboard on ASP activities and its acceptance among ASP leaders. Design: Frontline stewards were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews before and after implementation of a web-based ASP information dashboard providing risk-adjusted benchmarking, longitudinal trends, and analysis of antimicrobial usage patterns at each facility. Setting: The study was performed at Iowa City VA Health Care System. Participants: ASP team members from nine medical centers in the VA Midwest Health Care Network (VISN 23). Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted pre- and post-implementation, with interview guides informed by clinical experiences and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants evaluated the dashboard's ease of use, applicability to ongoing ASP activities, perceived validity and reliability, and relative advantage over other ASP monitoring systems. Results: Compared to established stewardship data collection and reporting methods, participants found the dashboard more intuitive and accessible, allowing them to reduce dependence on other systems and staff to obtain and share data. Standardized and risk-adjusted rankings were largely accepted as a valuable benchmarking method; however, participants felt their facility's characteristics significantly influenced the rankings' validity. Participants recognized staffing, training, and uncertainty with using the dashboard as an intervention tool as barriers to consistent and comprehensive dashboard implementation. Conclusions: Participants generally accepted the dashboard's risk-adjusted metrics and appreciated its usability. While creating automated tools to rigorously benchmark antimicrobial use across hospitals can be helpful, the displayed metrics require further validation, and the longitudinal utility of the dashboard warrants additional study.

Identifiers

PMID37502245
PMCPMC10369443
OpenAlexW4383739163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.