ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2022
A Case of Coil Embolization with Crossing Y-Configuration Stenting for a Recurrent IC-PC Aneurysm after Clipping.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gap between the clip and coil mass as a predictor of aneurysm recurrence and occlusion: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We report a case in which coil embolization using crossing Y-configuration stenting was effective for an internal carotid-posterior communicating artery (IC-PC) aneurysm with repeated recurrence after clipping. Case Presentation: The patient was a 57-year-old woman. Nine months after undergoing clipping for a ruptured right IC-PC aneurysm at 55 years of age, she developed a second subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to recurrence of the aneurysm and underwent clipping at the same site. A third SAH due to rupture of the left IC-PC aneurysm developed 1.5 years after the second clipping. Simultaneously, recurrence of a right IC-PC aneurysm was noted and she was referred to our department. The recurrent right IC-PC aneurysm was considered to have originated from the distal to the initial neck. It was 7 mm in size and had an irregularly shaped wide neck. As it was assumed that there would be marked adhesion due to repeated surgery, we decided to treat the aneurysm by coil embolization instead of direct surgery. Although the aneurysm neck partially involved the posterior communicating artery (Pcom), tight packing with a minimal residual neck was required. Therefore, crossing Y-configuration stenting was deployed on the internal carotid artery and Pcom using two Neuroform Atlas stents, and coil embolization was performed by the jail technique. The recurrent aneurysm was obliterated. There were no deficits or thrombotic complications after surgery. On DSA follow-up, no compaction or recurrence was observed, and the Pcom was well visualized one year later. Conclusion: Coil embolization by crossing Y-configuration stenting is a viable treatment option for a recurrent IC-PC wide neck aneurysm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.