ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2023
Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy for the Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization: Results of the Questionnaire Survey.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and hemodynamic efficacy of the LVIS stent in the endovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: a single-center retrospective study.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in the New Flow Diversion Era.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Review
- Perianeurysmal edema after coil embolization of a giant ruptured aneurysm: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Comparative study of four platelet function tests conducted using two systems in neuroendovascular patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Antiplatelet Therapy in Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine the status of perioperative antiplatelet therapy in stent-assisted coil embolization (SAC) in Japan. Methods: The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions and used Google forms, and was sent to institutions where endovascular specialists were employed. The results were analyzed. Results: The responses from 307 centers indicated that the timing of initiation of antiplatelet therapy was 14 days-1 month before treatment in half of centers, and 7-14 days before treatment in the other half. Platelet function tests were performed at 165 centers (56.2%), of which 136 centers (46.3%) performed these tests for all patients, with the VerifyNow system being the most widely used tool. The duration of postoperative dual antiplatelet therapy was 6, 3, and 12 months in 169 (57.7%), 70 (23.5%), and 42 (14.3%) centers, respectively. The antiplatelet agents used for monotherapy were P2Y12 receptor antagonists or aspirin, with a postoperative period of up to 12 months in 139 centers (47.3%), 24 months in 68 centers (23.1%), and longer than 24 months in 50 centers (17%). Conclusion: Current antiplatelet therapy for SAC in Japan varies widely among institutions. Moreover, each center has its own empirical rules for SAC. Therefore, the findings of this survey suggest the need to establish guidelines for optimal periprocedural antiplatelet therapy for SAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.