Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37502013›Full record

ReviewEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance glyphosate.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Marco Binaglia, Anna Federica Castoldi, Arianna Chiusolo, Federica Crivellente, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait and 27 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Enteric Nervous System Damage by Food Contaminants: A Pathway to Neurodegeneration?Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review and meta-analysis of glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancers.Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Fernando Álvarez
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Marco Binaglia
Anna Federica Castoldi
Arianna Chiusolo
Federica Crivellente
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Franco Ferilli
Varvara Gouliarmou
Laia Herrero Nogareda
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Aude Kienzler
Anna Lanzoni
Roberto Lava
Alberto Linguadoca
Christopher Lythgo
Iris Mangas
Laura Padovani
Martina Panzarea
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Simone Rizzuto
Anamarija Romac
Agnès Rortais
Rositsa Serafimova
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Anne Theobald
Manuela Tiramani
Giorgia Vianello
Laura Villamar-Bouza

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the Assessment Group on Glyphosate (AGG), consisting of the competent authorities of France, the Netherlands, Sweden and Hungary, acting jointly as rapporteur Member State for the pesticide active substance glyphosate are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of glyphosate as a herbicide as proposed by the applicants, covering uses pre-sowing, pre-planting and pre-emergence plus post-harvest in vegetables and sugar beet; post-emergence of weeds in orchards, vineyards, row vegetables, railway tracks against emerged annual, biennial and perennial weeds. Moreover, uses as spot treatment against invasive species in agricultural and non-agricultural areas, and in vegetables and sugar beet against couch grass are also included. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.

Indexed as

glyphosateherbicidepeer reviewpesticiderisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37502013
PMCPMC10369247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.