ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2021
Paradoxical Cerebral Embolization Caused by Thrombus-In-Transit via a Patent Foramen Ovale in a Patient with Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Importance of CT Angiography in Detecting Impending Paradoxical Embolism in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- A patient with sudden pulmonary embolism and stroke after total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was diagnosed with patent foramen ovale: case report and review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening cardiovascular event associated with high mortality and morbidity. The presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with acute PE represents a risk factor for mortality. Furthermore, a thrombus-in-transit via a PFO with impending paradoxical embolism carries a high mortality rate. Case Presentation: An adult patient with ischemic stroke caused by paradoxical embolism following PE underwent mechanical thrombectomy and achieved successful recanalization. Initial CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) showed not only pulmonary thromboemboli but also bilateral atrial thromboemboli. During hospitalization, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed the PFO with a right-to-left shunt. Two months after rehabilitation undergone by the patient, PE completely disappeared and PFO closure was conducted to reduce the recurrence risk of ischemic stroke. Conclusion: Not only cardiologists but also interventional neurologists should understand that CTPA can demonstrate the thrombus-in-transit through the PFO and provides a reliable prediction of the sudden onset of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic PE. When identified, considering a case-by-case treatment approach by multidisciplinary teams is essential for preventing further life-threatening paradoxical embolization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.