ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2021
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress in intracranial artery dissections over past 25 years: a review and bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Screening for Mild Vertebral Artery Dissection Using 3-Dimensional T1-weighted Black-blood Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Retrospective Observational Study of 3,049 Consecutive Walk-in Patients Presenting with Headache.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Observational
- De novo contralateral vertebral artery dissection after treatment: incidence and clinical characteristics.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- A Metallic Screw Gun-Traumatic Vertebral Artery Dissection Injury: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Article
- Individualized treatment for pediatric intracranial aneurysms in China: case series and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Stent-assisted coil embolization of ruptured vertebral artery dissected aneurysm with severe stenosis of bilateral vertebral artery V4 segment by the transmountain technique: a case report and review of the literatures.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Artery Dissections in Posterior Circulation.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is the most common arterial dissection in intracranial arteries. Some types of VAD can heal spontaneously after reconstitution of the vessel lumen with excellent prognosis, whereas others can progress to stroke that needs treatment. Recently, endovascular treatment (EVT) has emerged and is suggested as a treatment option for VADs due to perceived low rates of procedure-related morbidity with good efficacy. In the last decade, we have accumulated our strategies to treat those VADs. Here, we try to share our experiences about VADs, including indications and methods of treatment of VADs using EVT. We perform EVT for ruptured VADs presenting with SAH and some of unruptured VADs such as VAD with recurrent or progressive ischemia, dissecting aneurysm larger than 7 mm or with mass effect, early ugly change of VADs in shape and size during follow-up period, involving the basilar artery (BA) and bilateral VADs. We present how we have done in our real practice for the last decade for treating VADs by EVT rather than reviewing and organizing so-far-published literature. We tended to occlude the rupture point by vertebral artery (VA) occlusion in non-dominant VA or stent-assisted coiling in dominant VA for ruptured VADs. We tended to reconstruct original hemodynamics using various stents for unruptured VADs. To decide what to treat and how to treat are very complicated for VADs. However, we believe that EVT is the current mainstay for treating VADs. Each technique of EVT should be determined on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of endovascular neurosurgeons and/or interventional neuroradiologists according to presenting symptoms, hemodynamic status, including sufficiency of the collateral supply and anatomic features of the vertebrobasilar artery as well as the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior spinal artery, and medullary perforators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.