ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2020
Evaluation of the Partial Re-Sheathing Technique with the Solitaire Stent Retrieval System
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frictional force analysis of stent retriever devices using a realistic vascular model: Pilot study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Vascular injuries are severe complications associated with endovascular thrombectomy. In the present study, we evaluated the re-sheathing technique with the Solitaire stent retrieval system to overcome these complications. Methods: We examined the diameter and resistance to retrieval of the Solitaire FR device (6 × 20 mm) during full and partial deployment Results: We found that the Solitaire device spread elliptically during partial deployment. As the length of the partially deployed device decreased, the maximum diameter also decreased. The distal half of the stent retained 80% of the maximum diameter of the partially deployed Solitaire. The resistance to retrieval was significantly higher during full deployment (mean ± standard deviation; 0.32 ± 0.04 kg) than during half deployment (0.22 ± 0.04 kg) (Mann-Whitney U test; p = 0.006). The re-sheathing technique was used in the representative case due to the high resistance to retrieval, which enabled recanalization without extravasation. Conclusion: In cases of high resistance to retrieval, minimal re-sheathing may be useful for capturing the thrombus without increasing the risk of vascular injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.