Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37501735›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2022

A Recurrent Large Posterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Successfully Treated with Parent Artery Occlusion Using Somatosensory-Evoked Potential: A Case Report.

Miyahito Kugai, Takehiro Suyama, Masahiko Kitano, Yoshiko Tominaga, Shinsuke Tominaga

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miyahito KugaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Takehiro SuyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiko KitanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiko TominagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Shinsuke TominagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Tominaga hospital · JPKansai Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Treatment of large posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysm involving the P1-P2 segment is difficult by both neurosurgery and endovascular treatment. Balloon occlusion test (BOT) to identify precise peripheral collateral flow is difficult prior to parent artery occlusion (PAO). Besides, PAO at the aneurysm at this location can cause peripheral cortical infarction of the occipital and temporal lobes and/or perforator infarction involving the midbrain and thalamus perfused by the perforating artery arising from the P1-P2 segment. However, detection of the perforator during PAO is difficult. Case Presentation: The patient was a 49-year-old woman. At the age of 43 years, a right large PCA aneurysm was discovered in the right P1-P2 segment. A simple technique coiling was performed. As recurrence was identified 1 year later, embolization was performed using a same procedure. Since further recurrences were later found, a third round of treatment was planned. Somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) was recorded as intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring. Tortuosity of the right PCA was observed at the aneurysm neck and the distal right PCA could not be secured. We could neither perform stent-assisted coil embolization nor BOT in the right PCA. Hence, we inflated the balloon in the basilar artery and checked the collateral circulation routes retrograde into the right PCA from the right middle cerebral artery via a leptomeningeal anastomosis. PAO was performed on the right P1-P2 segment at the aneurysm neck. The signal of the SEP was not decreased, and the aneurysm was not visualized. Another coil was added to strengthen the PAO to the right P1 segment, which decreased the SEP amplitude in the extremities by 3 minutes after. As the last coil was thought to be occluding the perforator branching from the right P1 segment, it was removed without detaching. The SEP amplitude began to improve and recovered by 9 minutes after. There was no postoperative deficit. No recurrence of aneurysm was observed on MRA 9 months postoperatively. Conclusion: During PAO at the P1 segment of large PCA aneurysm involving the P1-P2 segment, SEP may be helpful to prevent perforator infarction, even if perforating artery originating from the proximal portion of the aneurysm was not detected by angiography.

Indexed as

aneurysmintraoperative electrophysiological monitoringparent artery occlusionposterior cerebral arterysomatosensory-evoked potential

Identifiers

PMID37501735
PMCPMC10370874
OpenAlexW4291671999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.