ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2020
Practical Use of a Communication Application on Mobile Devices by Our Stroke Team.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and preliminary trial test of a decision-making app for pre-hospital damage control resuscitation.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025Article
- Article
- Effective Smartphone Application Use for Postoperative Management of Moyamoya Disease.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe our 1-year experience of the practical use of a mobile communication application by our stroke team. Methods: The mobile Join application (Allm Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was introduced into our stroke team for the purpose of immediate sharing of the patient information. We analyzed the usage situation for 1 year after the introduction of Join, particularly its efficacy in improving the door-to-puncture time (D2P) for thrombectomy cases, and reported our inter-hospital collaboration with the use of Join. Results: The total number of events notified by Join was 337, and they included acute stroke potentially leading to reperfusion therapy in 23% (76 events), head trauma in 14%, brain hemorrhage in 12%, other infarction in 10%, subarachnoid hemorrhage in 8%, and the others in 34%. The information of the patients was shared among the team members before arrival to our hospital in 42% of acute stroke cases. Of 31 patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, the median interval between arrival and groin puncture for the directly transported patients with/without pre-hospital information was 77.5 min/87 min, respectively, whereas that of the patients transferred from primary hospitals with/without pre-hospital information was 19 min/71 min (p <0.0001), respectively, demonstrating the efficacy of information sharing in advance through Join in improving the timing of endovascular therapy. For inter-hospital collaboration using the telestroke system, we concluded the partnership agreement with three local primary hospitals by communication via Join at a reasonable cost. Conclusion: Active and effective utilization of the mobile Join application for communication by our stroke team was demonstrated, and it is expected to promote inter-hospital collaboration in stroke treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.