ArticleClinical cardiology2023
Noncontrast cardiac computed tomography-derived mitral annular calcification scores in mitral valve disease.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility and Exploration of a Standardized Protocol for Cardiac CT Assessment of Rheumatic Mitral Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Noncontrast cardiac computed tomography-derived mitral annular calcification scores in mitral valve disease.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsMitral annular calcification (MAC) by computed tomography (CT) is reported as an independent predictor of poor outcomes. However, it currently remains unclear if quantitative MAC parameters provide more value for mitral valve disease (MVD) management, therefore, we examined the prognostic value of MAC scores using noncontrast cardiac-CT in MVD patients.
methodsBetween January 2020 and December 2021, we prospectively enrolled 300 consecutive patients with MVD (MAC-present = 80 and MAC-absent = 220) undergoing preoperative cardiac-CT and mitral valve (MV) surgery. Noncontrast cardiac-CT images were used to qualitatively detect MAC (present or absent) and evaluate MAC scores. For analyses, we also collected baseline clinical data, intraoperative conversion (from MV repair to MV replacement), and follow-up arrhythmia data.
resultsCompared with the MAC-absent group, MAC-present patients were older (62 ± 7 vs. 58 ± 9 years, p < .001), mostly women (55% vs. 39.5%, p = .017), and also had aortic valve calcification (57.5% vs. 23.2%, p < .001), mitral stenosis (82.5% vs. 61.8%, p < .001), atrial fibrillation (30% vs. 11.8%, p < .001), and larger left atrial end-diastolic dimension (LADD, 49 [44-56] versus 46 [41-50], p = .001]. Furthermore, MAC-present patients underwent more MV replacements (61.8% vs. 82.5%, p = .001) and experienced a higher intraoperative conversion prevalence (11.8% vs. 61.3%, p < .001). Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that the female gender (odds ratio [OR]/95% confidence interval [CI]/p = 2.001/1.042-3.841/0.037) and MAC scores (OR/95% CI/p = 10.153/4.434-23.253/p < .001) were independent predictors of intraoperative conversion. During a follow-up of 263 ± 134 days, MAC-present patients had more arrhythmias (42.5% vs. 9.5%, p < .001). Also, MAC-scores (hazard ratio [HR]/95% CI/p = 6.841/3.322-14.089/p < .001) and LADD (HR/95% CI/p = 1.039/1.018-1.060/p < .001) were independently associated with arrhythmias by Cox regression analyses.
conclusionsNoncontrast cardiac CT-derived MAC-scores showed a high risk for intraoperative conversion and follow-up arrhythmias in MVD-patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.