Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37501037›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

Systemic Anticancer Treatment Near the End of Life: a Narrative Literature Review.

Teresa Geyer, Nguyen-Son Le, Iris Groissenberger, Franziska Jutz, Lisa Tschurlovich, Gudrun Kreye

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teresa GeyerKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Nguyen-Son LeKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Iris GroissenbergerKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Franziska JutzKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Lisa TschurlovichKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Gudrun KreyeKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria. Gudrun.kreye@krems.lknoe.at.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-7079
Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementSystemic anticancer therapy (SACT) includes different treatment modalities that can be effective in treating cancer. However, in the case of disease progression, cancers might become incurable and SACT might reach its limits. In the case of incurable cancers, SACT is often given in a palliative setting, with the goal of improving the patients' quality of life (QOL) and their survival. In contrast, especially for patients who approach end of life (EOL), such treatments might do more harm than good. Patients receiving EOL anticancer treatments often experience belated palliative care referrals. The use of systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and poor prognosis approaching the EOL has been associated with significant toxicity and worse QOL compared to best supportive care. Therefore, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has discouraged this practice, and it is considered a metric of low-value care by Choosing Wisely (Schnipper et al. in J Clin Oncol 4;30(14):1715-24). Recommendations of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) suggest that especially chemotherapy and immunotherapy should be avoided in the last few weeks of the patients' lives. In this narrative review, we screened the current literature for the impact of SACT and factors predicting the use of SACT near the EOL with discussion on this topic.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeDeathHumansMedical OncologyPalliative CareEnd of life (EOL)Palliative careSystemic anticancer treatment (SACT)

Identifiers

PMID37501037
PMCPMC10547806
OpenAlexW4385298773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.