Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37500921›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety.

Juan S Barajas-Gamboa, Soon Moon, Gustavo Romero-Velez, Andrew T Strong, Matthew Allemang, Salvador Navarrete, Ricard Corcelles, John Rodriguez, Matthew Kroh, Jerry T Dang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juan S Barajas-GamboaDigestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Soon MoonDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Gustavo Romero-VelezDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Andrew T StrongDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Matthew AllemangDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Salvador NavarreteDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ricard CorcellesDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
John RodriguezDigestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Matthew KrohDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jerry T DangDigestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. DANGJ3@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming increasingly common, but data regarding safety is of these conversions is scarce. As such, the objective of this study was to compare the 30-day rate of serious complications and mortality of primary SADI (p-SADI-S) with SG to SADI (SG-SADI) conversions.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed the MBSAQIP database. Patients undergoing p-SADI-S and SG-SADI were included. Data collection was limited to 2020 and 2021. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed between groups to determine if SG-SADI was an independent predictor of 30-day serious complications or mortality.

resultsA total of 783 patients were included in this study, 488 (62.3%) underwent p-SADI-S and 295 (37.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery was lower in the SG-SADI cohort (45.1 vs 51.4 kg/m

conclusionsThe prevalence of SG-SADI is high, representing 37.6% of SADI-S procedures. Conversion from sleeve to SADI, is safe, and as opposed to other studies of revisional bariatric surgery, has similar 30-day complication rates to primary SADI-S.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesBariatric surgeryInadequate weight lossRevisional surgerySADI-SSleeve gastrectomyWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID37500921
OpenAlexW4385298907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.