ArticleAmino acids2023
CSC01 shows promise as a potential inhibitor of the oncogenic G13D mutant of KRAS: an in silico approach.
Article in Amino acids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing AI-driven reverse docking in drug discovery: a comprehensive review of opportunities, challenges, and emerging trends.Journal of molecular modeling · 2025Review
- Evolution of computational techniques against various KRAS mutants in search for therapeutic drugs: a review article.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2025Review
- Enzyme inhibitors for drug discovery.Amino acids · 2023Article
- CHAPERONComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
About 30% of malignant tumors include KRAS mutations, which are frequently required for the development and maintenance of malignancies. KRAS is now a top-priority cancer target as a result. After years of research, it is now understood that the oncogenic KRAS-G12C can be targeted. However, many other forms, such as the G13D mutant, are yet to be addressed. Here, we used a receptor-based pharmacophore modeling technique to generate potential inhibitors of the KRAS-G13D oncogenic mutant. Using a comprehensive virtual screening workflow model, top hits were selected, out of which CSC01 was identified as a promising inhibitor of the oncogenic KRAS mutant (G13D). The stability of CSC01 upon binding the switch II pocket was evaluated through an exhaustive molecular dynamics simulation study. The several post-simulation analyses conducted suggest that CSC01 formed a stable complex with KRAS-G13D. CSC01, through a dynamic protein-ligand interaction profiling analysis, was also shown to maintain strong interactions with the mutated aspartic acid residue throughout the simulation. Although binding free energy analysis through the umbrella sampling approach suggested that the affinity of CSC01 with the switch II pocket of KRAS-G13D is moderate, our DFT analysis showed that the stable interaction of the compound might be facilitated by the existence of favorable molecular electrostatic potentials. Furthermore, based on ADMET predictions, CSC01 demonstrated a satisfactory drug likeness and toxicity profile, making it an exemplary candidate for consideration as a potential KRAS-G13D inhibitor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.