Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37500784›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Evaluation of swallowing in children with higher grades glottic web.

Ahmed El-Sobki, Reham Ae Ibrahim, Saad Elzayat, Mohamed E El-Deeb, Bassem Ashraf, Menna Ibrahim Hashish, Mahmoud Elsaid Ibrahim Alsobky, Abeer Salamah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed El-SobkiOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Reham Ae IbrahimPhoniatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Saad ElzayatOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
Mohamed E El-DeebOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. Deeb_van@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6029-8529
Bassem AshrafOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Menna Ibrahim HashishPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mahmoud Elsaid Ibrahim AlsobkyOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine-Damietta, Alazhar University, Damietta, Egypt.
Abeer SalamahPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeto evaluate the swallowing function in children with higher grades of glottic web and to detect the impact of surgical division of the glottic web on the swallowing parameters. We also performed a voice analysis as a secondary objective in this study.

methodsThis prospective case series study included 12 children with higher grades of the glottic web; grades 3 and 4. Evaluation of the swallowing function was done by clinical swallowing evaluation including symptoms and signs of swallowing dysfunction during feeding, such as vomiting, coughing, choking, or cyanosis, and bedside swallowing assessment using the 3-oz water swallow test. Instrumental evaluation of swallowing function was performed using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). The evaluation was performed both preoperatively and postoperatively.

resultsThe number of children suffering from swallowing difficulties significantly increased during the postoperative evaluation where 6 (50%) children demonstrated choking during feeding after the surgical division of the web in comparison to only 3 (25%) preoperatively. Also, coughing and choking during the 3-oz water swallow test significantly increased following the division of the web with P < 0.001.

conclusionSwallowing assessment is mandatory as children with higher grades of the glottic web, requiring reconstructive surgeries, are at risk of swallowing deficit which can be aggravated postoperatively. With improvement in the airway and surgery-specific outcomes, swallowing function is an important secondary outcome that has a significant impact on the lives of these kids and their families.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionDeglutition DisordersChildDeglutitionGlottisHumansWaterWaterAspirationChildrenLaryngeal webSurgerySwallowing disorders

Identifiers

PMID37500784
PMCPMC10562259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.