Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37500755›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2024

Predicting mental and psychomotor delay in very pre-term infants using machine learning.

Gözde M Demirci, Phyllis M Kittler, Ha T T Phan, Anne D Gordon, Michael J Flory, Santosh M Parab, Chia-Ling Tsai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gözde M Demirci *Computer Science Department, The Graduate Center of the City University of NY, New York, NY, USA.
Phyllis M Kittler *Department of Infant Development, NYS Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA.
Ha T T PhanDepartment of Infant Development, NYS Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA.
Anne D GordonDepartment of Infant Development, NYS Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA.
Michael J FloryDepartment of Infant Development, NYS Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA.
Santosh M ParabPediatrics, Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, NY, USA.
Chia-Ling TsaiComputer Science Department, Queens College of the City University of NY, Flushing, NY, USA. chialing.tsai@qc.cuny.edu.
New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities · USRichmond University Medical Center · USCity University of New York · USQueens College, CUNY · US

Funding

NICHD NYS OPWDDNICHD NIH HHS P01-HD47281NICHD NIH HHS R01- HD21784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVery preterm infants are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental delays. Earlier prediction of delays allows timelier intervention and improved outcomes. Machine learning (ML) was used to predict mental and psychomotor delay at 25 months.

methodsWe applied RandomForest classifier to data from 1109 very preterm infants recruited over 20 years. ML selected key predictors from 52 perinatal and 16 longitudinal variables (1-22 mo assessments). SHapley Additive exPlanations provided model interpretability.

resultsBalanced accuracy with perinatal variables was 62%/61% (mental/psychomotor). Top predictors of mental and psychomotor delay overlapped and included: birth year, days in hospital, antenatal MgSO

conclusionsCombining perinatal and longitudinal data, ML modeling predicted 24 month mental/psychomotor delay in very preterm infants ½ year early, allowing intervention to start that much sooner. Modeling using only perinatal features fell short of clinical application. Birth year's importance reflected a linear decline in predicting delay as birth year became more recent. IMPACT: Combining perinatal and longitudinal data, ML modeling was able to predict 24 month mental/psychomotor delay in very preterm infants ½ year early (25% of their lives) potentially advancing implementation of intervention services. Although cognitive/verbal and fine/gross motor delays require separate interventions, in very preterm infants there is substantial overlap in the risk factors that can be used to predict these delays. Birth year has an important effect on ML prediction of delay in very preterm infants, with those born more recently (1989-2009) being increasing less likely to be delayed, perhaps reflecting advances in medical practice.

Indexed as

Infant, Newborn, DiseasesMotor Skills DisordersBirth WeightFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37500755
PMCPMC10899098
OpenAlexW4385297431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.