Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37500463›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2023

Assessing patients' social risks: what can England learn from emerging evidence in the US?

Rebecca Fisher, Laura M Gottlieb, Emilia De Marchis, Hugh Alderwick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Metabolic Medicine: A Narrative Review of Insights and Innovations for the Future.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
  2. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca FisherCommonwealth Fund Harkness Fellow in Health Care Policy and Practice, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, US (on sabbatical from role as senior policy fellow at the Health Foundation and NHS GP, UK).ORCID 0000-0002-1092-6144
Laura M GottliebProfessor of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, US.ORCID 0000-0003-2669-4066
Emilia De MarchisAssistant Professor of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, US.ORCID 0000-0003-1782-1609
Hugh AlderwickDirector of Policy, the Health Foundation, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9362-2567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentSocial EnvironmentEnglandHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37500463
PMCPMC10405964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.