ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023
Long-Term Follow-up of Multinodular and Vacuolating Neuronal Tumors and Implications for Surveillance Imaging.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multinodular and vacuolating neuronal tumor: magnetic resonance imaging features.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Radiologic characterization and clinical management of multinodular and vacuolating neuronal tumor (MVNT): a retrospective institutional cohort study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Multinodular and Vacuolating Neuronal Tumors: Imaging Features, Diagnosis, and Management Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multinodular and Vacuolating Neuronal Tumor-like Lesion of the Spinal Cord: Two Case Reports.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Multinodular and Vacuolating Neuronal Tumor Initially Misdiagnosed as Acute Cerebral Infarction Presenting With Thunderclap Headache.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMost multinodular and vacuolating neuronal tumors (MVNTs) are diagnosed and followed radiologically without any change across time. There are no surveillance guidelines or quantitative volumetric assessments of these tumors. We evaluated MVNT volumes during long follow-up periods using segmentation tools with the aim of quantitative assessment. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll patients with MVNTs in a brain MR imaging report in our system were reviewed. Patients with only 1 brain MR imaging or in whom MVNT was not clearly the most likely diagnosis were excluded. All MVNTs were manually segmented. For all follow-up examinations, absolute and percentage volume change from immediately prior and initial examinations were calculated.
resultsForty-eight patients (32 women; median age, 50.5 years at first scanning) underwent 158 brain MRIs. The median duration between the first and last scan was 15.6 months (interquartile range, 5.7-29.6 months; maximum, 6.4 years) and between consecutive scans, it was 6.7 months (interquartile range, 3.3-12.4 months; maximum, 4.9 years). Pearson correlation coefficients between days since immediately prior scan versus absolute and percentage volume change from immediately prior scan were
conclusionsMVNT segmentation across follow-up brain MR imaging examinations did not demonstrate significant volume differences, suggesting that these tumors do not enlarge with time. Hence, frequent surveillance imaging of newly diagnosed MVNTs may not be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.