Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37500276›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Variation in daytime general practice services and association with out-of-hours use for older patients: protocol for a Danish cohort study.

Jonas K Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. General practice consultation patterns and patient factors predicting older patients' use of out-of-hours services: a nationwide register-based cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas K OlsenResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark jkolsen@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7286-2513
Sonja WehbergResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Frans Boch WaldorffSection of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniel Pilsgaard HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper LykkegaardResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-6136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOut-of-hours primary care services cannot provide the same continuity and coordination of care as general practice. Thus, patients with high risk of complex care trajectories should, when possible, be treated by the general practitioner during daytime opening hours. This study aims to analyse the variation among general practices in the frequencies of daytime services for persons aged ≥75 years and how it relates to the patients' use of out-of-hours services. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged ≥75 years, of whom >98% are listed with a general practice. Using Poisson regression, we will estimate each practice's excess variation in delivered daytime services compared with the expected based on the characteristics of its listed patients. Delivered daytime services will be analysed overall and separately for face-to-face, phone, email, home visit and preventive services. The association with the use of out-of-hours services will be analysed by Poisson regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Complying with European data protection rules, the legal services at University of Southern Denmark (Research & Innovation Organisation) approved the data processing activities regarding this project (journal number 11.593). According to section 14.2 of the Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Projects, because the study is based solely on register data, approval from the ethics committee and informed consent are not required. Results from the study will be disseminated as publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals and at international conferences.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersCohort StudiesDenmarkHumansACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEAgedHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services for the AgedPrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID37500276
PMCPMC10387735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.