Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37499980›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Global Coverage of Mandatory Large-Scale Food Fortification Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fabian Rohner, James P Wirth, Wu Zeng, Nicolai Petry, William E S Donkor, Lynnette M Neufeld, Penjani Mkambula, Sydney Groll, Mduduzi Nn Mbuya, Valerie M Friesen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Vitamin BClinical nutrition ESPEN · 2025
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Folic acid: friend or foe in cancer therapy.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabian RohnerGroundWork, Fläsch, Switzerland.
James P WirthGroundWork, Fläsch, Switzerland. Electronic address: james@groundworkhealth.org.
Wu ZengGroundWork, Fläsch, Switzerland; Georgetown University, School of Health, Washington DC, United States.
Nicolai PetryGroundWork, Fläsch, Switzerland.
William E S DonkorGroundWork, Fläsch, Switzerland.
Lynnette M NeufeldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO; formerly GAIN).
Penjani MkambulaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Sydney GrollGroundWork, Fläsch, Switzerland; Georgetown University, School of Health, Washington DC, United States.
Mduduzi Nn MbuyaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Valerie M FriesenGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food fortification with micronutrients is widely implemented to reduce micronutrient deficiencies and related outcomes. Although many factors affect the success of fortification programs, high population coverage is needed to have a public health impact. We aimed to provide recent global coverage estimates of salt, wheat flour, vegetable oil, maize flour, rice, and sugar among countries with mandatory fortification legislation. The indicators were the proportion of households consuming the: food, fortifiable food (that is, industrially processed), fortified food (to any extent), and adequately fortified food (according to national or international standards). We estimated the number of individuals reached with fortified foods. We systematically retrieved and reviewed all applicable evidence from: published reports and articles from January 2010 to August 2021, survey lists/databases from key organizations, and reports/literature received from key informants. We analyzed data with R statistical package using random-effects meta-analysis models. An estimated 94.4% of households consumed salt, 78.4% consumed fortified salt (4.2 billion people), and 48.6% consumed adequately fortified salt in 64, 84, and 31 countries, respectively. Additionally, 77.4% of households consumed wheat flour, 61.6% consumed fortifiable wheat flour, and 47.1% consumed fortified wheat flour (66.2 million people) in 15, 8, and 10 countries, respectively, and 87.0% consumed vegetable oil, 86.7% consumed fortifiable oil, and 40.1% consumed fortified oil (123.9 million people) in 10, 7, and 5 countries, respectively. Data on adequately fortified wheat flour and vegetable oil and coverage indicators for maize flour, rice, and sugar were limited. There are major data gaps on fortification coverage for most foods except salt. All countries with mandatory fortification programs should generate and use more coverage data to assess program performance and adjust programs as needed to realize their potential to reduce micronutrient deficiencies (PROSPERO CRD42021269364).

Indexed as

FlourFood, FortifiedHumansMicronutrientsPlant OilsSodium Chloride, DietarySugarsTriticumMicronutrientsPlant OilsSodium Chloride, DietarySugarscoveragefortificationmaizericesaltsugarvegetable oilwheat flour

Identifiers

PMID37499980
PMCPMC10509437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.