ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023
VIP interneurons in sensory cortex encode sensory and action signals but not direct reward signals.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cortical PV and VIP interneurons similarly influence SST neuron output despite distinct unitary properties.Communications biology · 2026Article
- A shared predictive architecture in the sensory cortex for statistical and reward-based learning.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Inhibitory circuit motifs of cortical somatosensory layer 5 SST interneurons are uniform within layers but specific across layers.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Dysfunctional neural dynamics associated with sensory phenotypes in Fragile X syndrome: insights from mouse models.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Review
- Feature selective inhibitory mechanisms enable expectation suppression in cortical microcircuits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inhibition mediated by group III metabotropic glutamate receptors regulates habenula activity and defensive behaviors.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Brain region-specific gain modulation of place cells by VIP neurons.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Functional thalamocortical innervation of VIP- and SST-expressing GABAergic interneurons in mouse barrel cortex.iScience · 2025Article
- Neocortical somatostatin neuron diversity in cognition and learning.Trends in neurosciences · 2025Review
- Postnatal development of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-expressing GABAergic interneurons in mouse somatosensory cortex.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Cell Type-Specific Modulation of Acute Itch Processing in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Transient enhancement of stimulus-evoked activity in neocortex during sensory learning.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) interneurons in sensory cortex modulate sensory responses based on global exploratory behavior and arousal state, but their function during non-exploratory, goal-directed behavior is not well understood. In particular, whether VIP cells are activated by sensory cues, reward-seeking actions, or directly by reinforcement is unclear. We trained mice on a Go/NoGo whisker touch detection task that included a delay period and other features designed to separate sensory-evoked, action-related, and reward-related neural activity. Mice had to lick in response to a whisker stimulus to receive a variable-sized reward. Using two-photon calcium imaging, we measured ΔF/F responses of L2/3 VIP neurons in whisker somatosensory cortex (S1) during behavior. In both expert and novice mice, VIP cells were strongly activated by whisker stimuli and goal-directed actions (licking), but not by reinforcement. VIP cells showed somatotopic whisker tuning that was spatially organized relative to anatomical columns in S1, unlike lick-related signals which were spatially widespread. In expert mice, lick-related VIP responses were suppressed, not enhanced, when a reward was delivered, and the amount of suppression increased with reward size. This reward-related suppression was not seen in novice mice, where reward delivery was not yoked to licking. These results indicate that besides arousal and global state variables, VIP cells are activated by local sensory features and goal-directed actions, but not directly by reinforcement. Instead, our results are consistent with a role for VIP cells in encoding the expectation of reward associated with motor actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.