Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37499598›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2023

An International Survey of Current Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Alessandro De Bortoli, Daniel Arnold Culver, Jordana Kron, Jukka Lehtonen, Francis Murgatroyd, Toshiyuki Nagai, Pablo Balbuena Nery, David Hugh Birnie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. ANMCO position paper: diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved systolic function.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Alessandro De BortoliDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Cardiology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway. Electronic address: de.bortoli.alessandro@gmail.com.
Daniel Arnold CulverCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jordana KronPauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Jukka LehtonenHeart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Francis MurgatroydDepartment of Cardiology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Toshiyuki NagaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Pablo Balbuena NeryDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David Hugh BirnieDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CACleveland Clinic · USHokkaido University · JPKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a potentially serious form of infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Despite scarce evidence, immunosuppressive treatment is generally recommended, but local routines may vary significantly. We sought to survey the clinical practices in the treatment of CS, with the aim that the results may suggest future research priorities. We conducted a web-based survey focused on treatment-naive patients with CS. We subclassified CS according to the presence/absence of overt cardiac presentation (clinically manifest/silent) and to the presence/absence of active inflammation (metabolically active/inactive by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography). The survey was developed jointly by the authors and administered to expert clinicians (n = 79) involved in CS treatment. An agreement threshold was set at 70%. A total of 62 of 79 respondents (78.5%) from 12 countries completed the survey. The agreement threshold was reached for: (1) always treating clinically manifest, metabolically active CS, 57 of 62 (91.9%), (2) never treating clinically silent, metabolically inactive CS, 44 of 62 (71.0%), (3) not requiring histopathologic confirmation of sarcoidosis before treatment initiation, (49 of 62, 79.0%), (4) using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessing treatment indication (44 of 62, 71.0%) and treatment response (44 of 62, 71.0%), and (5) using prednisone as a first-line agent (100%), although respondents were divided on monotherapy (69.4%) or combination with methotrexate 25.8%. The approach to particular scenarios, tapering, and duration of treatment showed the greatest variation in response. In conclusion, in this survey of clinical practice, important aspects of CS treatment reached the agreement threshold, whereas others showed a great degree of clinical equipoise.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesMyocarditisSarcoidosisFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyPrednisoneRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18PrednisoneRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID37499598
OpenAlexW4385251586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.