ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2023
An International Survey of Current Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implications of the 2024 American Heart Association Classification of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Characteristics and Outcome of Patients Across the Continuum of Diagnostic Likelihood.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Latest Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Article
- ANMCO position paper: diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved systolic function.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- Detection of Myocardial Deformation Patterns and Prognostic Value of Routine Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis Versus Extracardiac Sarcoidosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Updated Insights on Epidemiology and Diagnostic Criteria.The American journal of cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a potentially serious form of infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Despite scarce evidence, immunosuppressive treatment is generally recommended, but local routines may vary significantly. We sought to survey the clinical practices in the treatment of CS, with the aim that the results may suggest future research priorities. We conducted a web-based survey focused on treatment-naive patients with CS. We subclassified CS according to the presence/absence of overt cardiac presentation (clinically manifest/silent) and to the presence/absence of active inflammation (metabolically active/inactive by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography). The survey was developed jointly by the authors and administered to expert clinicians (n = 79) involved in CS treatment. An agreement threshold was set at 70%. A total of 62 of 79 respondents (78.5%) from 12 countries completed the survey. The agreement threshold was reached for: (1) always treating clinically manifest, metabolically active CS, 57 of 62 (91.9%), (2) never treating clinically silent, metabolically inactive CS, 44 of 62 (71.0%), (3) not requiring histopathologic confirmation of sarcoidosis before treatment initiation, (49 of 62, 79.0%), (4) using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessing treatment indication (44 of 62, 71.0%) and treatment response (44 of 62, 71.0%), and (5) using prednisone as a first-line agent (100%), although respondents were divided on monotherapy (69.4%) or combination with methotrexate 25.8%. The approach to particular scenarios, tapering, and duration of treatment showed the greatest variation in response. In conclusion, in this survey of clinical practice, important aspects of CS treatment reached the agreement threshold, whereas others showed a great degree of clinical equipoise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.