Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37499131›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2023

Insights into Mechanical Dynamics of Nanoscale Interfaces in Epoxy Composites Using Nanorheology Atomic Force Microscopy.

Hung K Nguyen, Atsuomi Shundo, Makiko Ito, Bede Pittenger, Satoru Yamamoto, Keiji Tanaka, Ken Nakajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of Condensed Water at an Alumina/Epoxy Resin Interface on Curing Reaction.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
  11. Electronic Interaction of Epoxy Resin with Copper at the Adhered Interface.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hung K NguyenDepartment of Chemical Science and Engineering, School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-2533
Atsuomi ShundoCenter for Polymer Interface and Molecular Adhesion Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7898-3233
Makiko ItoDepartment of Chemical Science and Engineering, School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.
Bede PittengerBruker Nano Surfaces, AFM Unit, Santa Barbara, California 93117, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-878X
Satoru YamamotoCenter for Polymer Interface and Molecular Adhesion Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0238-3039
Keiji TanakaCenter for Polymer Interface and Molecular Adhesion Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0314-3843
Ken NakajimaDepartment of Chemical Science and Engineering, School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7495-0445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interfacial polymer layers with nanoscale size play critical roles in dissipating the strain energy around cracks and defects in structural nanocomposites, thereby enhancing the material's fracture toughness. However, understanding how the intrinsic mechanical dynamics of the interfacial layer determine the toughening and reinforcement mechanisms in various polymer nanocomposites remains a major challenge. Here, by means of a recently developed nanorheology atomic force microscopy method, also known as nanoscale dynamic mechanical analysis (nDMA), we report direct mapping of dynamic mechanical responses at the interface of a model epoxy nanocomposite under the transition from a glassy to a rubbery state. We demonstrate a significant deviation in the dynamic moduli of the interface from matrix behavior. Interestingly, the sign of the deviation is observed to be reversed when the polymer changes from a glassy to a rubbery state, which provides an excellent explanation for the difference in the modulus reinforcement between glassy and rubbery epoxy nanocomposites. More importantly, nDMA loss tangent images unambiguously show an enhanced viscoelastic response at the interface compared to the bulk matrix in the glassy state. This observation can therefore provide important insights into the nanoscale toughening mechanism that occurs in epoxy nanocomposites due to viscoelastic energy dissipation at the interface.

Indexed as

epoxy nanocompositefracture toughnessmechanical dynamicsnanoscale interfacenDMA−AFMviscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID37499131
PMCPMC10416213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.