Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498968›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2023

Honey bees and social wasps reach convergent architectural solutions to nest-building problems.

Michael L Smith, Kevin J Loope, Bajaree Chuttong, Jana Dobelmann, James C Makinson, Tatsuya Saga, Kirstin H Petersen, Nils Napp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The GenusInsects · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Michael L SmithDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3454-962X
Kevin J LoopeDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Bajaree ChuttongMeliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Jana DobelmannInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
James C MakinsonHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.
Tatsuya SagaGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Kirstin H PetersenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Nils NappDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Cornell University · USChiang Mai University · THKobe University · JPUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Konstanz · DEVirginia Tech · USWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hexagonal cells built by honey bees and social wasps are an example of adaptive architecture; hexagons minimize material use, while maximizing storage space and structural stability. Hexagon building evolved independently in the bees and wasps, but in some species of both groups, the hexagonal cells are size dimorphic-small worker cells and large reproductive cells-which forces the builders to join differently sized hexagons together. This inherent tiling problem creates a unique opportunity to investigate how similar architectural challenges are solved across independent evolutionary origins. We investigated how 5 honey bee and 5 wasp species solved this problem by extracting per-cell metrics from 22,745 cells. Here, we show that all species used the same building techniques: intermediate-sized cells and pairs of non-hexagonal cells, which increase in frequency with increasing size dimorphism. We then derive a simple geometric model that explains and predicts the observed pairing of non-hexagonal cells and their rate of occurrence. Our results show that despite different building materials, comb configurations, and 179 million years of independent evolution, honey bees and social wasps have converged on the same solutions for the same architectural problems, thereby revealing fundamental building properties and evolutionary convergence in construction behavior.

Indexed as

BeesNesting BehaviorWaspsAnimals

Identifiers

PMID37498968
PMCPMC10374112
OpenAlexW4385323484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.