Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498910›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Hip and trunk kinematics during reaching on a mobile and stable seat.

Michelle C Haas, Bettina B Sommer, Samuel Karrer, Matthias Jörger, Eveline S Graf, Martin Huber, Daniel Baumgartner, Christoph M Bauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle C HaasSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7829-1368
Bettina B SommerSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1231-2987
Samuel KarrerSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Matthias JörgerSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Eveline S GrafSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4740-8145
Martin HuberSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Daniel BaumgartnerSchool of Engineering, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Christoph M BauerSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaching movements are often used to assess selective trunk control in people with neurological conditions. Also, it is known that reaching performance after stroke is increased through training on a mobile seat compared to conventional physical therapy. However, the effect of a mobile seat on joint kinematics has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to quantify differences in the range of motion of the hip and trunk during reaching exercises on a mobile and stable sitting surface. Fifteen healthy participants performed reaching beyond arm's length on a mobile and a stable seat in four different directions: ipsilateral, anterior, contralateral, and contralateral diagonal. Biomechanical data were collected, including kinematics of the hip and trunk, and surface electromyography of the trunk muscles. The mobile sitting surface led to a higher range of motion in the trunk and the hip in the frontal and sagittal plane, but not in the rotational plane. Differences between reaching directions were found in all joint directions, except that of trunk flexion. Hence, movement patterns of the hip and trunk differ during reaching on different sitting surfaces and in different directions. A larger range of motion in the frontal or sagittal plane while training on the mobile seat provides added neuromuscular stimuli to the trunk muscles (= a higher demand on trunk muscles), which could result in more efficient training and therefore, increased trunk control after stroke. However, this has to be investigated in a future study with people after stroke.

Indexed as

MovementStrokeBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularTorso

Identifiers

PMID37498910
PMCPMC10374116
OpenAlexW4385327160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.