Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498845›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Optimal timing and cutoff range of lung ultrasound in predicting surfactant administration in neonates: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Keren Luo, Haoran Wang, Fangjun Huang, Jun Tang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Neonatal point-of-care ultrasound-guidelines for training, credentialing and quality assurance.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Lung Ultrasound in Critical Care: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keren LuoDepartment of Neonatology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Haoran WangWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Fangjun HuangWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Jun TangDepartment of Neonatology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4884-4248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTimely application of surfactant replacement therapy is critical for neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Presently, early clinical decision on surfactant use relies solely on ventilator parameters. However, ventilator parameters are unable to truly recapitulate the extent of surfactant deficiency. Lung ultrasound has been increasingly used in the early prediction of surfactant use in recent years, but its predictive value remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine its predictive value in surfactant use and determine the optimal timing and cutoff value.

methodsStudies on neonates with respiratory distress or diagnosed with RDS were collected from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Primary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of lung ultrasound.

resultsTen eligible studies with 1162 participants were included. The sensitivity and specificity of lung ultrasound in predicting surfactant use were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90), respectively. Lung ultrasound performed within 1-3 h after birth had a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95) and a Youden's index of 0.67. Compared with a lung ultrasound score (LUS) cutoff of ≤6/7, ≤8, >5, >6/7, and >8, a LUS cutoff of ≤5 had higher Youden's index (0.73) and sensitivity (0.94, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97) in predicting surfactant use.

conclusionsLung ultrasound is effective for predicting surfactant use in neonates. Lung ultrasound within 1-3 h after birth and a LUS cutoff of 5 are recommended. However, the symptoms and oxygenation of the neonatal patients must also be considered.

Indexed as

Pulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornHumansInfant, NewbornLipoproteinsLungSurface-Active AgentsUltrasonographyLipoproteinsPulmonary SurfactantsSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID37498845
PMCPMC10374100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.