Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498836›Full record

ReviewPLOS digital health2023

The potential use of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in healthcare and medical research.

Antonio Yaghy, Nicole Rose I Alberto, Isabelle Rose I Alberto, Rene S Bermea, Ljubica Ristovska, Maria Yaghy, Sandra Hoyek, Nimesh A Patel, Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Journal of medical extended reality · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonio YaghyNew England Eye Center, Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-495X
Nicole Rose I AlbertoCollege of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Isabelle Rose I AlbertoCollege of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Rene S BermeaDivision of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ljubica RistovskaHarvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Maria YaghyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Timone Enfants, Marseille, France.
Sandra HoyekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nimesh A PatelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Leo Anthony CeliLaboratory for Computational Physiology, MIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Research Training in Pulmonary Immunology and Allergy at MGHT32HL116275 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI David C Christiani, ANDREW D LUSTER · 2013 to 2026
$8.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL116275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are cryptographic assets recorded on the blockchain that can certify authenticity and ownership, and they can be used to monetize health data, optimize the process of receiving a hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and improve the distribution of solid organs for transplantation. Blockchain technology, including NFTs, provides equitable access to wealth, increases transparency, eliminates personal or institutional biases of intermediaries, reduces inefficiencies, and ensures accountability. Blockchain architecture is ideal for ensuring security and privacy while granting individuals jurisdiction over their own information, making it a unique solution to the current limitations of existing health information systems. NFTs can be used to give patients the option to monetize their health data and provide valuable data to researchers. Wearable technology companies can also give their customers the option to monetize their data while providing data necessary to improve their products. Additionally, the process of receiving a hematopoietic stem cell transplant and the distribution of solid organs for transplantation could benefit from the integration of NFTs into the allocation process. However, there are limitations to the technology, including high energy consumption and the need for regulatory guidance. Further research is necessary to fully understand the potential of NFTs in healthcare and how it can be integrated with existing health information technology. Overall, NFTs have the potential to revolutionize the healthcare sector, providing benefits such as improved access to health information and increased efficiency in the distribution of organs for transplantation.

Identifiers

PMID37498836
PMCPMC10374113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.