ReviewPloS one2023
Survival outcomes of breast cancer patients with recurrence after surgery according to period and subtype.
Review in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pretreatment Prediction of Tumor Recurrence in Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Using Machine Learning With Clinical and CT Radiomics Features.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Predicting early-stage breast cancer disease-free survival and adjuvant therapy benefit from multimodal information using deep learning.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- A qualitative study on the mismatch between health literacy and nursing needs in the postoperative recovery of breast cancer: nurse and survivor perspectives.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- BCL2-Associated Transcription Factor 1 Promotes SRC/Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Subunit α-Mediated Cancer Stemness in Radioresistant Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Polypropylene Mesh in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Vietnamese Early Breast Cancer Patients: Safe and Feasible.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze and compare the survival rates of recurrent breast cancer patients in Korea between two periods (period I: 2000-2007; period II: 2008-2013) and to identify the factors associated with outcomes and changes over time in the duration of survival after recurrence.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 2,407 patients who had recurrent breast cancer with treated between January 2000 and December 2013 and divided them into two periods according to the year of recurrence. We reviewed the age at diagnosis, clinical manifestations, pathology report, surgical methods, types of adjuvant treatment, type of recurrence, and follow-up period.
resultsThe median follow-up was 30.6 months (range, 0-223.4) from the time of relapse, and the median survival time was 42.3 months. Survival after recurrence (SAR) significantly improved from 38.0 months in period I to 49.7 months in period II (p < 0.001). In the analysis performed according to the hormone receptor and HER2 status subtypes, all subtypes except the triple-negative subtype showed higher SAR in period II than period I. Age at diagnosis, tumor stage, and treatment after recurrence were significantly correlated with survival outcomes.
conclusionThe survival outcomes of Korean patients with breast cancer after the first recurrence have improved in Korea. Such improvements may be attributed to advances in treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.