Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498623›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2023

Human cell-based in vitro systems to assess respiratory toxicity: a case study using silanes.

Monita Sharma, Andreas O Stucki, Sandra Verstraelen, Todd J Stedeford, An Jacobs, Frederick Maes, David Poelmans, Jo Van Laer, Sylvie Remy, Evelien Frijns and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. New approach methodologies (NAMs) for theFrontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Monita SharmaPETA Science Consortium International e.V., 70499 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2859-2581
Andreas O StuckiPETA Science Consortium International e.V., 70499 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0997-8502
Sandra VerstraelenSustainable HEALTH Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), BE-2400 Mol, Belgium.
Todd J StedefordThe Acta Group, Washington, District of Columbia 20037, USA.
An JacobsSustainable HEALTH Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), BE-2400 Mol, Belgium.
Frederick MaesSustainable HEALTH Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), BE-2400 Mol, Belgium.
David PoelmansSustainable HEALTH Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), BE-2400 Mol, Belgium.
Jo Van LaerSustainable HEALTH Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), BE-2400 Mol, Belgium.
Sylvie RemySustainable HEALTH Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), BE-2400 Mol, Belgium.
Evelien FrijnsSustainable HEALTH Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), BE-2400 Mol, Belgium.
David G AllenInotiv, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27560, USA.
Amy J ClippingerPETA Science Consortium International e.V., 70499 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3623-1196
Flemish Institute for Technological Research · BEACTA (United States) · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

PETA Science Consortium International e.V.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalation is a major route by which human exposure to substances can occur. Resources have therefore been dedicated to optimize human-relevant in vitro approaches that can accurately and efficiently predict the toxicity of inhaled chemicals for robust risk assessment and management. In this study-the IN vitro Systems to PredIct REspiratory toxicity Initiative-2 cell-based systems were used to predict the ability of chemicals to cause portal-of-entry effects on the human respiratory tract. A human bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) and a reconstructed human tissue model (MucilAir, Epithelix) were exposed to triethoxysilane (TES) and trimethoxysilane (TMS) as vapor (mixed with N2 gas) at the air-liquid interface. Cell viability, cytotoxicity, and secretion of inflammatory markers were assessed in both cell systems and, for MucilAir tissues, morphology, barrier integrity, cilia beating frequency, and recovery after 7 days were also examined. The results show that both cell systems provide valuable information; the BEAS-2B cells were more sensitive in terms of cell viability and inflammatory markers, whereas MucilAir tissues allowed for the assessment of additional cellular effects and time points. As a proof of concept, the data were also used to calculate human equivalent concentrations. As expected, based on chemical properties and existing data, the silanes demonstrated toxicity in both systems with TMS being generally more toxic than TES. Overall, the results demonstrate that these in vitro test systems can provide valuable information relevant to predicting the likelihood of toxicity following inhalation exposure to chemicals in humans.

Indexed as

Epithelial CellsSilanesBronchiCell LineHumansSilanestriethoxysilanetrimethoxysilaneinhalationin vitro methodsnew approach methodologies (NAMs)nonanimal methodsrespiratory toxicity

Identifiers

PMID37498623
PMCPMC10535780
OpenAlexW4385294760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.