ArticleJAMA2023
Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots.
Article in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tips for Getting Your Research Published.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026Article
- Navigating the use of artificial intelligence in the peer review process: Cautionary pearls from the editorial board.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Strengths and Potential Pitfalls of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatric Education and Practice.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Large Language Models and the Future of Peer-Reviewed Medical Publishing: Challenges, Editorial Responses, and a Framework for Responsible Integration.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Review
- Agentic Artificial Intelligence for the Automated Generation of Accurate Summary Podcasts of Radiology Research Papers.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Non-Native English Speakers in Verbal Scientific Communication and Dissemination.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Susceptibility of large language models to hidden nudge injection during simulated medical peer review: a quasi-experimental study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- AI in Medical Education Research, Writing, and Reviewing: JGME's Policy in 2026.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
- The Ethics of Authorship.The Ulster medical journal · 2026Article
- When AI reviews your work: author-centered reflections on LLMs in peer review.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Scientific Publishing: Policy Landscape for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Tracing the Pen: Electronic Health Records Amid the Rise of Generative AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Writing: Balancing Innovation and Efficiency with Integrity: Perspectives and Position Statements of Global Andrology Forum Expert Group.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- Prompt injection in manuscripts: exploiting loopholes or crossing ethical lines?Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- The Ethical Aspects of AI in Scientific Publishing.EJIFCC · 2026Article
- Amplifying signal-to-noise: Responsible use of large language models in radiology publishing.Clinical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Statistical Errors: Implications for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- From calculators to artificial intelligence: moving beyond rejection to responsible adoption.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Conducting Eating Disorder Research in the Era of Generative AI: Researcher Perspectives and Guidelines From the International Journal of Eating Disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence for Scholarly Writing.The American journal of nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37498593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.