Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498558›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Sub-Cluster Identification through Semi-Supervised Optimization of Rare-Cell Silhouettes (SCISSORS) in single-cell RNA-sequencing.

Jack R Leary, Yi Xu, Ashley B Morrison, Chong Jin, Emily C Shen, Peyton C Kuhlers, Ye Su, Naim U Rashid, Jen Jen Yeh, Xianlu Laura Peng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack R LearyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-8821-3269
Yi XuDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Ashley B MorrisonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Chong JinDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Emily C ShenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Peyton C KuhlersLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Ye SuLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Naim U RashidLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Jen Jen YehLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Xianlu Laura PengLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8684-5762
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

SToP Cancer SPORE: Developmental Research ProgramP50CA257911 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Alina Iuga · 2022 to 2026
$12.9M
Tumor Subtypes and Therapy Response in Pancreatic CancerR01CA199064 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TSAI, SUSAN, YEH, JEN JEN · 2016 to 2021
$4.4M
Pathway and Network Integration of Cancer Genomics and Clinical DataU24CA211000 · NCI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI RAPHAEL, BENJAMIN, YEH, JEN JEN · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA257911NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199064NCI NIH HHS U24 CA211000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSingle-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has enabled the molecular profiling of thousands to millions of cells simultaneously in biologically heterogenous samples. Currently, the common practice in scRNA-seq is to determine cell type labels through unsupervised clustering and the examination of cluster-specific genes. However, even small differences in analysis and parameter choosing can greatly alter clustering results and thus impose great influence on which cell types are identified. Existing methods largely focus on determining the optimal number of robust clusters, which can be problematic for identifying cells of extremely low abundance due to their subtle contributions toward overall patterns of gene expression.

resultsHere, we present a carefully designed framework, SCISSORS, which accurately profiles subclusters within broad cluster(s) for the identification of rare cell types in scRNA-seq data. SCISSORS employs silhouette scoring for the estimation of heterogeneity of clusters and reveals rare cells in heterogenous clusters by a multi-step semi-supervised reclustering process. Additionally, SCISSORS provides a method for the identification of marker genes of high specificity to the cell type. SCISSORS is wrapped around the popular Seurat R package and can be easily integrated into existing Seurat pipelines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SCISSORS, including source code and vignettes, are freely available at https://github.com/jr-leary7/SCISSORS.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingCluster AnalysisRNASequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisRNA

Identifiers

PMID37498558
PMCPMC10412410
OpenAlexW4385294687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.