Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498442›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2023

Effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia: a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial.

Julie Girard, Cédrick Zaouter, Alex Moore, François M Carrier, Martin Girard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04993001 (Impact of an Open Lung Extubation Strategy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Compared to a Conventional Extubation Strategy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04993001 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of an Open Lung Extubation Strategy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Compared to a Conventional Extubation Strategy: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled69ConditionsAnesthesia, Pulmonary Atelectasis, Complication of AnesthesiaArmsOpen lung extubation, Conventional extubation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie GirardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Cédrick ZaouterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alex MooreDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
François M CarrierDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Martin GirardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. martin.girard@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-0106
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a common cause of morbidity. Postoperative atelectasis is thought to be a significant risk factor in their development. Recent imaging studies suggest that patients' extubation may result in similar postoperative atelectasis regardless of the intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategy used. In this pilot trial, we hypothesized that a study investigating the effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional one on PPCs would be feasible.

methodsWe conducted a pilot, single-centre, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Adult patients at moderate to high risk of PPCs and scheduled for elective surgery were eligible. Patients were randomized to an open lung extubation strategy (semirecumbent position, fraction of inspired oxygen [F

resultsWe randomized 35 patients to the conventional extubation group and 34 to the open lung extubation group. We observed a global protocol adherence of 96% (95% confidence interval, 88 to 99), which was not different between groups. Eight PPCs occurred (two in the conventional extubation group vs six in the open lung extubation group). Less postoperative supplemental oxygen and better lung aeration were observed in the open lung extubation group.

conclusionsIn this single-centre pilot trial, we observed excellent feasibility. A multicentre pilot trial comparing the effect of an open lung extubation strategy with that of a conventional extubation strategy on the occurrence of PPCs is feasible. STUDY REGISTRATION DATE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); registered 6 August 2021.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationPulmonary AtelectasisAdultAnesthesia, GeneralHumansLungOxygenPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsOxygenatelectasisextubationgeneral anesthesialung ultrasonographymechanical ventilationpostoperative pulmonary complications

Identifiers

PMID37498442
OpenAlexW4385295600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.