ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Deep learning-based reconstruction for acceleration of lumbar spine MRI: a prospective comparison with standard MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in MR neuroimaging: toward quantitative and AI-driven brain and spinal cord imaging.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Visualization of the Trochlear Nerve Using Deep Learning-enhanced 3D T2-weighted MR Imaging at 3T.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of Robustness of MRI Radiomic Features in the Abdomen: Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction and Accelerated Acquisition.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning reconstruction for temporomandibular joint MRI: diagnostic interchangeability, image quality, and scan time reduction.European radiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based image enhancement for improved black blood imaging in brain metastasis.European radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Validation and feasibility of a deep learning-based reconstruction technology in 5.0 tesla knee joint MR imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic interchangeability of deep-learning based Synth-STIR images generated from T1 and T2 weighted spine images.European radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of deep learning MRI reconstruction for dental implant crowns in a phantom study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Can artificial intelligence in spine imaging affect current practice? Practical developments and their clinical status.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Deep learning MRI halves scan time and preserves image quality across routine neuroradiologic examinations.Radiology advances · 2025Article
- Enhancing Lesion Detection in Inflammatory Myelopathies: A Deep Learning-Reconstructed Double Inversion Recovery MRI Approach.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Observational
- Enhancing Radiologist Productivity with Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Accelerated Cervical Spine MRI: Utility in the Evaluation of Myelopathy and Degenerative Diseases.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Image Quality and Scan Time Efficiency in Accelerated 3D T1-Weighted Pediatric Brain MRI Using Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Prospective Evaluation of Accelerated Brain MRI Using Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction: Simultaneous Application to 2D Spin-Echo and 3D Gradient-Echo Sequences.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based reconstruction for 3-dimensional heavily T2-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance (MR) myelography in epidural fluid detection: image quality and diagnostic performance.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy for cervical spondylosis using T2w-STIR sequence with a deep learning-based reconstruction approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- 2023 Survey on User Experience of Artificial Intelligence Software in Radiology by the Korean Society of Radiology.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Deep Learning-based Image Enhancement Techniques for Fast MRI in Neuroimaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the image quality and diagnostic performance between standard turbo spin-echo MRI and accelerated MRI with deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction for degenerative lumbar spine diseases. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty patients who underwent both the standard and accelerated lumbar MRIs at a 1.5-T scanner for degenerative lumbar spine diseases were prospectively enrolled. DL reconstruction algorithm generated coarse (DL_coarse) and fine (DL_fine) images from the accelerated protocol. Image quality was quantitatively assessed in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and qualitatively assessed using five-point visual scoring systems. The sensitivity and specificity of four radiologists for the diagnosis of degenerative diseases in both protocols were compared.
resultsThe accelerated protocol reduced the average MRI acquisition time by 32.3% as compared to the standard protocol. As compared with standard images, DL_coarse and DL_fine showed significantly higher SNRs on T1-weighted images (T1WI; both p < .001) and T2-weighted images (T2WI; p = .002 and p < 0.001), higher CNRs on T1WI (both p < 0.001), and similar CNRs on T2WI (p = .49 and p = .27). The average radiologist assessment of overall image quality for DL_coarse and DL_fine was higher on sagittal T1WI (p = .04 and p < .001) and axial T2WI (p = .006 and p = .01) and similar on sagittal T2WI (p = .90 and p = .91). Both DL_coarse and DL_fine had better image quality of cauda equina and paraspinal muscles on axial T2WI (both p = .04 for cauda equina; p = .008 and p = .002 for paraspinal muscles). Differences in sensitivity and specificity for the detection of central canal stenosis and neural foraminal stenosis between standard and DL-reconstructed images were all statistically nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.05).
conclusionDL-based protocol reduced MRI acquisition time without degrading image quality and diagnostic performance of readers for degenerative lumbar spine diseases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction algorithm may be used to further accelerate spine MRI imaging to reduce patient discomfort and increase the cost efficiency of spine MRI imaging. KEY POINTS: • By using deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction algorithm in combination with the accelerated MRI protocol, the average acquisition time was reduced by 32.3% as compared with the standard protocol. • DL-reconstructed images had similar or better quantitative/qualitative overall image quality and similar or better image quality for the delineation of most individual anatomical structures. • The average radiologist's sensitivity and specificity for the detection of major degenerative lumbar spine diseases, including central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and disc herniation, on standard and DL-reconstructed images, were similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.