Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498386›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Deep learning-based reconstruction for acceleration of lumbar spine MRI: a prospective comparison with standard MRI.

Hyunsuk Yoo, Roh-Eul Yoo, Seung Hong Choi, Inpyeong Hwang, Ji Ye Lee, June Young Seo, Seok Young Koh, Kyu Sung Choi, Koung Mi Kang, Tae Jin Yun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Visualization of the Trochlear Nerve Using Deep Learning-enhanced 3D T2-weighted MR Imaging at 3T.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy for cervical spondylosis using T2w-STIR sequence with a deep learning-based reconstruction approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Deep Learning-based Image Enhancement Techniques for Fast MRI in Neuroimaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyunsuk YooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Roh-Eul YooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. roheul7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-5921
Seung Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Inpyeong HwangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ji Ye LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
June Young SeoDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seok Young KohDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Sung ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Koung Mi KangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Tae Jin YunDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

Airs Medical Inc 06- 2021-2210Korea Medical Device Development Fund KMDF_PR_20200901_0086National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A4A1028713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the image quality and diagnostic performance between standard turbo spin-echo MRI and accelerated MRI with deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction for degenerative lumbar spine diseases. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty patients who underwent both the standard and accelerated lumbar MRIs at a 1.5-T scanner for degenerative lumbar spine diseases were prospectively enrolled. DL reconstruction algorithm generated coarse (DL_coarse) and fine (DL_fine) images from the accelerated protocol. Image quality was quantitatively assessed in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and qualitatively assessed using five-point visual scoring systems. The sensitivity and specificity of four radiologists for the diagnosis of degenerative diseases in both protocols were compared.

resultsThe accelerated protocol reduced the average MRI acquisition time by 32.3% as compared to the standard protocol. As compared with standard images, DL_coarse and DL_fine showed significantly higher SNRs on T1-weighted images (T1WI; both p < .001) and T2-weighted images (T2WI; p = .002 and p < 0.001), higher CNRs on T1WI (both p < 0.001), and similar CNRs on T2WI (p = .49 and p = .27). The average radiologist assessment of overall image quality for DL_coarse and DL_fine was higher on sagittal T1WI (p = .04 and p < .001) and axial T2WI (p = .006 and p = .01) and similar on sagittal T2WI (p = .90 and p = .91). Both DL_coarse and DL_fine had better image quality of cauda equina and paraspinal muscles on axial T2WI (both p = .04 for cauda equina; p = .008 and p = .002 for paraspinal muscles). Differences in sensitivity and specificity for the detection of central canal stenosis and neural foraminal stenosis between standard and DL-reconstructed images were all statistically nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.05).

conclusionDL-based protocol reduced MRI acquisition time without degrading image quality and diagnostic performance of readers for degenerative lumbar spine diseases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction algorithm may be used to further accelerate spine MRI imaging to reduce patient discomfort and increase the cost efficiency of spine MRI imaging. KEY POINTS: • By using deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction algorithm in combination with the accelerated MRI protocol, the average acquisition time was reduced by 32.3% as compared with the standard protocol. • DL-reconstructed images had similar or better quantitative/qualitative overall image quality and similar or better image quality for the delineation of most individual anatomical structures. • The average radiologist's sensitivity and specificity for the detection of major degenerative lumbar spine diseases, including central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and disc herniation, on standard and DL-reconstructed images, were similar.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAccelerationConstriction, PathologicHumansLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingDeep learningImage reconstructionMagnetic resonance imagingSpine

Identifiers

PMID37498386
OpenAlexW4385295291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.