Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498381›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Predicting peritumoral edema development after gamma knife radiosurgery of meningiomas using machine learning methods: a multicenter study.

Xuanxuan Li, Yiping Lu, Li Liu, Dongdong Wang, Yajing Zhao, Nan Mei, Daoying Geng, Xin Ma, Weiwei Zheng, Shaofeng Duan and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuanxuan Li *Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12, Middle Wulumuqi Rd., Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Yiping Lu *Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12, Middle Wulumuqi Rd., Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Li Liu *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dongdong Wang *Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12, Middle Wulumuqi Rd., Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Yajing ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12, Middle Wulumuqi Rd., Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Nan MeiDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12, Middle Wulumuqi Rd., Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Daoying GengDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12, Middle Wulumuqi Rd., Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Xin MaSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Weiwei ZhengDepartment of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shaofeng DuanGE Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Pu-Yeh WuGE Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Hongkai WenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Yongli TanNeurosurgery Gamma Knife Centre, Zibo Wanjie Cancer Hospital, Zibo City, Shandong, China.
Xiaogang SunNeurosurgery Gamma Knife Centre, Zibo Wanjie Cancer Hospital, Zibo City, Shandong, China.
Shibin SunBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei LiNeurosurgery Department, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Tonggang YuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Gamma Hospital, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 518, Middle Wuzhong Rd., Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200235, China. ytg521@126.com.
Bo YinDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12, Middle Wulumuqi Rd., Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China. yinbo@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-8583
Fudan University · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital of Zibo City · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNUniversity of Warwick · GBWenzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Clinical Research Plan of SHDC SHDC2020CR4069Medical Engineering Fund of Fudan University yg2021-029Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2018SHZDZX01Shanghai Sailing Program 21YF1404800Youth Medical Talents -Medical Imaging Practitioner Program 3030256001Youth Program of Special Project for Clinical Research of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Health industry 20204Y0421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEdema is a complication of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) in meningioma patients that leads to a variety of consequences. The aim of this study is to construct radiomics-based machine learning models to predict post-GKS edema development.

methodsIn total, 445 meningioma patients who underwent GKS in our institution were enrolled and partitioned into training and internal validation datasets (8:2). A total of 150 cases from multicenter data were included as the external validation dataset. In each case, 1132 radiomics features were extracted from each pre-treatment MRI sequence (contrast-enhanced T1WI, T2WI, and ADC maps). Nine clinical features and eight semantic features were also generated. Nineteen random survival forest (RSF) and nineteen neural network (DeepSurv) models with different combinations of radiomics, clinical, and semantic features were developed with the training dataset, and evaluated with internal and external validation. A nomogram was derived from the model achieving the highest C-index in external validation.

resultsAll the models were successfully validated on both validation datasets. The RSF model incorporating clinical, semantic, and ADC radiomics features achieved the best performance with a C-index of 0.861 (95% CI: 0.748-0.975) in internal validation, and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.673-0.887) in external validation. It stratifies high-risk and low-risk cases effectively. The nomogram based on the predicted risks provided personalized prediction with a C-index of 0.962 (95%CI: 0.951-0.973) and satisfactory calibration.

conclusionThis RSF model with a nomogram could represent a non-invasive and cost-effective tool to predict post-GKS edema risk, thus facilitating personalized decision-making in meningioma treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The RSF model with a nomogram built in this study represents a handy, non-invasive, and cost-effective tool for meningioma patients to assist in better counselling on the risks, appropriate individual treatment decisions, and customized follow-up plans. KEY POINTS: • Machine learning models were built to predict post-GKS edema in meningioma. The random survival forest model with clinical, semantic, and ADC radiomics features achieved excellent performance. • The nomogram based on the predicted risks provides personalized prediction with a C-index of 0.962 (95%CI: 0.951-0.973) and satisfactory calibration and shows the potential to assist in better counselling, appropriate treatment decisions, and customized follow-up plans. • Given the excellent performance and convenient acquisition of the conventional sequence, we envision that this non-invasive and cost-effective tool will facilitate personalized medicine in meningioma treatment.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaRadiosurgeryEdemaHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesDeep learningEdemaGamma knife radiosurgeryMachine learningMeningioma

Identifiers

PMID37498381
OpenAlexW4385295718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.