Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498217›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2023

RNA origami: design, simulation and application.

Erik Poppleton, Niklas Urbanek, Taniya Chakraborty, Alessandra Griffo, Luca Monari, Kerstin Göpfrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. De novo design of RNA and nucleoprotein complexes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Embracing exascale computing in nucleic acid simulations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Synthetic RNA biology.RNA biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA origami: a tool to evaluate and harness transcription factors.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erik PoppletonBiophysical Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5146-5970
Niklas UrbanekBiophysical Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-7623-8599
Taniya ChakrabortyBiophysical Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-4465-8343
Alessandra GriffoBiophysical Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4588-1289
Luca MonariBiophysical Engineering Group, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1538-4081
Kerstin GöpfrichBiophysical Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2115-3551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design strategies for DNA and RNA nanostructures have developed along parallel lines for the past 30 years, from small structural motifs derived from biology to large 'origami' structures with thousands to tens of thousands of bases. With the recent publication of numerous RNA origami structures and improved design methods-even permitting co-transcriptional folding of kilobase-sized structures - the RNA nanotechnolgy field is at an inflection point. Here, we review the key achievements which inspired and enabled RNA origami design and draw comparisons with the development and applications of DNA origami structures. We further present the available computational tools for the design and the simulation, which will be key to the growth of the RNA origami community. Finally, we portray the transition from RNA origami structure to function. Several functional RNA origami structures exist already, their expression in cells has been demonstrated and first applications in cell biology have already been realized. Overall, we foresee that the fast-paced RNA origami field will provide new molecular hardware for biophysics, synthetic biology and biomedicine, complementing the DNA origami toolbox.

Indexed as

NanostructuresNanotechnologyComputer SimulationDNANucleic Acid ConformationRNADNARNAcomputational designco-transcriptional foldingDNA origamigenetic encodingmolecular simulationRNA nanostructuresRNA nanotechnologyRNA origami

Identifiers

PMID37498217
PMCPMC10376919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.